11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thursday, October 7, 2010, 8:00-8:50Session A1: Alternate Bearings in THA 1Wear Testing <strong>of</strong> Highly Crosslinked UHMWPE Against 36 Mm CoCr and44 Mm Oxidized Zirconium Femoral HeadsIntroduction:*Amit Parikh - Smith & Nephew, Inc. - Memphis, USAPatrick Hill - Smith & Nephew, Inc. - Memphis, USAVivek Pawar - Smith & Nephew, Inc. - Memphis, USAMark Morrison - Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics - Memphis, USA*Email: amit.parikh@smithnephew.comLarge diameter femoral heads <strong>of</strong>fer increased range <strong>of</strong> motion and reduced risk <strong>of</strong>dislocation. However, <strong>the</strong>ir use in total hip arthroplasty has historically been limited by <strong>the</strong>ircorrelation with increased polyethylene wear. The improved wear resistance <strong>of</strong> highlycrosslinked UHWMPE has led a number <strong>of</strong> clinicians to transition from implanting traditionallypopular sizes (28mm and 32 mm) to implanting 36 mm heads. Desire to fur<strong>the</strong>r increasestability and range <strong>of</strong> motion has spurred interest in even larger sizes (> 36 mm). While <strong>the</strong>long-term clinical ramifications are unknown, in-vivo measurements <strong>of</strong> highly crosslinkedUHMWPE liners indicate increases in head diameter are associated with increased volumetricwear [1]. The goal <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine if this increase in wear could be negated byusing femoral heads with a ceramic surface, such as oxidized Zr-2.5Nb (OxZr), ra<strong>the</strong>r thanCoCrMo (CoCr). Specifically, wear <strong>of</strong> 10 Mrad crosslinked UHMWPE (XLPE) against 36 mmCoCr and 44 mm OxZr heads was compared.Materials and Methods:Ram-extruded GUR 1050 UHMWPE was crosslinked by gamma irradiation to 10 Mrad,remelted, and machined into acetabular liners. Liners were sterilized using vaporized hydrogenperoxide and tested against ei<strong>the</strong>r 36 mm CoCr or 44 mm OxZr (OXINIUM) heads (n=3).All implants were manufactured by Smith & Nephew (Memphis, TN).Testing was conducted on a hip simulator (AMTI, Watertown, MA) as previously described[2]. The 4000N peak load (4 time body weight for a 102 kg/ 225 lb patient) and 1.15 Hzfrequency used are based upon data obtained from an instrumented implant during fastwalking/jogging and have previously been shown to generate measurable XLPE wear [2,3].Lubricant was a serum (Alpha Calf Fraction, HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT) solution thatwas replaced once per week [2]. Liners were weighed at least once every million cycles(Mcycle) over <strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> testing (~ 5 Mcycle). Loaded soak controls were used to correctfor fluid absorption. Single factor ANOVA was used to compare groups (α = 0.05).Results:The predominant wear feature displayed on <strong>the</strong> articular surface <strong>of</strong> liners was burnishing.There were no signs <strong>of</strong> fatigue wear or <strong>of</strong> delamination. Mean wear rates (± std dev) <strong>of</strong> linersarticulated against 36mm CoCr and 44 mm OxZr heads were 3.7 ± 0.4 mm 3 /Mcycle and 2.7 ±0.4 mm 3 /Mcycle, respectively (Figure 1). This difference was statistically significant (p =file:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!