11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Friday, October 8, 2010, 15:00-16:00Session A15: Alternate Bearings 2Acetabular Reconstruction Using Reinforcement Ring and Cemented Metalon Metal Cup for Revision Hip ArthroplastyIntroduction:*Inder Gill - Wansbeck General Hospital - Ashington, United KingdomMurali Krishnan - Wansbeck General Hospital - Ashington, United KingdomMike Reed - Wansbeck General Hospital - Ashinton, United KingdomPaul Partington - Wansbeck General Hospital - Ashington, United Kingdom*Email: ipgill@yahoo.comTo report <strong>the</strong> short to medium term results <strong>of</strong> acetabular reconstruction usingreinforcement/reconstruction ring, morcellised femoral head allograft and cemented metal onmetal cup.Methods:Single centre retrospective study <strong>of</strong> 6 consecutive patients who <strong>under</strong>went acetabularreconstruction for revision hip surgery.The acetabulum was reconstructed using morcellised femoral head allograft and reinforcementor reconstruction ring fixed with screws. The Birmingham cup – designed for cementlessfixation, was cemented into <strong>the</strong> ring in all cases. The uncemented Echelon stem with metal onmetal modular head was used for reconstructing <strong>the</strong> femur.Data from our previous in-vitro study had shown good pull out strength <strong>of</strong> a cementedBirmingham cup.Results:There were 2 men and 4 women with a mean age <strong>of</strong> 75 years(57-83). Revision was performedfor aseptic loosening in 2, septic loosening in 2 and peri-pros<strong>the</strong>tic fracture with loosening in 2patients.All patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically at a mean <strong>of</strong> 36 months followup(range24 - 42 months).Revision was not necessary in any patient for failure <strong>of</strong> acetabular or femoral fixation.However, 1 patient had revision to a proximal femoral replacement and constrained cup forrecurrent infection and osteomyelitis at 24 months. This patient was excluded from <strong>the</strong> finalanalysis.The mean Harris hip score at last follow up was 79(range 70-89).Radiographic analysis revealed good graft incorporation and no signs <strong>of</strong> loosening or cup/ringmigration.No dislocations or metal ion problems were recorded in this series.file:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!