11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ResultsThe two cadaver specimens tested at 55:45 medial:lateral (M:L) force distribution survived <strong>the</strong>100,000 cycle test, while both cadaver specimens tested at 75:25 M:L force distribution failed.The finite element model generated distinct differences in compressive strain distributionpatterns in <strong>the</strong> proximal tibia. A threshold <strong>of</strong> 2000 microstrain was used for fatigue damage inbone <strong>under</strong> cyclic loading. Both specimens loaded <strong>under</strong> 75:25 M:L distribution demonstratedsubstantially larger cortical bone volumes in <strong>the</strong> proximal tibial cortex that were greater thanthis fatigue threshold.Discussion & ConclusionWe validated a finite element model <strong>of</strong> tibial loading after TKA. Local compressive strainsdirectly correlated with subsidence and failure in cadaver testing. A significantly greatervolume <strong>of</strong> proximal tibial cortical bone was compressed to a strain greater than <strong>the</strong> fatiguethreshold in <strong>the</strong> varus alignment group, indicating an increased risk for fatigue damage. Thismodel is extremely valuable in studying <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> surgical alignment, loading, and activityon damage to proximal bone. Emerging techniques that customize tibial tray placement to <strong>the</strong>individual patient’s pre-arthritic alignment run counter to <strong>the</strong> traditional recommendations forcoronal alignment to <strong>the</strong> mechanical axis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> knee. A method that determines <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong>bone damage in a patient-specific manner can provide <strong>the</strong> surgeon with a safe range forcomponent alignment and may even be applicable in preoperative planning.Saturday, October 9, 2010, 14:50-15:20Session A22: Tribology and Biomechanics in ArthroplastyLab-in-a-Knee: Simultaneous Measurement <strong>of</strong> in Vivo Forces andKinematics*Darryl D'Lima - Scripps - La Jolla, USAClifford Colwell Jr. - Scripps - La Jolla, USANikolai Steklov - Scripps - La Jolla, USAShantanu Patil - Scripps - La Jolla, USA*Email: ddlima@gmail.comBackground: While in vivo kinematics and forces in <strong>the</strong> knee have been studied extensively,<strong>the</strong>se are typically measured during controlled activities conducted in an artificial laboratoryenvironment and <strong>of</strong>ten do not reflect <strong>the</strong> natural day-to-day activities <strong>of</strong> typical patients. Wehave developed a novel algorithm that toge<strong>the</strong>r with our electronic tibial component provideunsupervised simultaneous dynamic 3-D kinematics and forces in patients.file:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!