11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Branislav Jaramaz - The Western Pennsylvania Hospital - Pittsburgh, USA*Email: mhafez@msn.comIntroduction: Dislocation following total hip replacement (THR) remains a significant clinicalproblem and can occur even with optimal implant alignment. Our hypo<strong>the</strong>sis was that differentpatterns <strong>of</strong> pelvic flexion / extension during daily activities could influence acetabularalignment and contribute to impingement and instability following THR. Methods: This studyaimed at identifying different patterns <strong>of</strong> pelvic flexion / extension xthat could be predictive forinstability following THR. A range <strong>of</strong> motion (ROM) simulator was used to demonstrate <strong>the</strong>effects <strong>of</strong> different patterns <strong>of</strong> pelvic flexion / extension on ROM and impingement. The findingswere applied to pelvic flexion / extension measurements obtained from 84 patients in standingand sitting positions. Results: Three different categories <strong>of</strong> pelvic flexion / extension wereidentified; normal, hypermobile and stiff. ROM simulator revealed that changes in pelvicflexion / extension had significant effects on ROM and impingement. Patients in <strong>the</strong> stiff pelviscategory, even with “optimal” implant alignment, were more susceptible to implantimpingement. Conclusions: The different patterns <strong>of</strong> pelvic flexion/ extension during dailyactivities could affect acetabular alignment and stability following THR. We propose aclassification system that can identify different types <strong>of</strong> pelvic flexion / extension and predict<strong>the</strong>ir effects on <strong>the</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> THR. Patients with unfavourablevccc pelvic flexion / extensionwho are susceptible to impingement may require modified cup alignment.Table I: Classification <strong>of</strong> pelvic flexion / extension with suggestions for acetabular cupalignment.Type I Type II Type IIIName NormalHypermobile pelvis(Exaggerated response)Stiff pelvisMobileII-aII-bIII-aIII-bExtensionFlexion TypeExtension TypeFlexion TypePelvic flexion /extension instandingPelvic flexion /extension in sittingTypeFlex Flex Excessive Flex Lack <strong>of</strong> Flex FlexExt Excessive Ext Ext Ext Lack <strong>of</strong> ExtStability Stable StableUnstablebut sensitive to malalignment even with optimal acetabularalignmentWeak Weak posteriorly Anterior PosterioranteriorlyFlex = flexion Ext = extension Ant = anterior Post = posteriorExt Rot = external rotation Int Rot = internal rotation ADL = activities <strong>of</strong> daily livingfile:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!