11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusion:The dual mobility cup is a highly effective option to manage unstable total hip arthroplasty.Unlike constrained devices, such components provide encouraging radiologic results regarding<strong>the</strong> potential for loosening and osteolysis. Longer follow up is needed to confirm <strong>the</strong>se results.FiguresFriday, October 8, 2010, 7:30-8:30Session B9: Complications in ArthroplastyConstrained Implants for Total Hip Arthroplasty Instability: Analysis <strong>of</strong>FailuresIntroduction:*Olivier Guyen - Edouard Herriot Hospital - Lyon, FranceDavid Lewallen - Mayo Clinic - Rochester, USAMiguel Cabanela - Mayo Clinic - Rochester, USA*Email: oguyen@hotmail.comRecurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty remains a serious and somewhat frequentproblem. Constrained implants have proven effective to manage instability. This has led to aliberal utilization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se devices. However, sporadic mechanical failures have been reported.This report analyzes <strong>the</strong> failures <strong>of</strong> a single constrained device at our institution.Materials and Methods:Forty-three constrained implants (Stryker Constrained Liner TM ) in 34 patients were revised out<strong>of</strong> total 390 similar implants performed at our institution. There were 24 females and 10 males.Constrained implant was inserted at <strong>the</strong> first revision in 6 hips and after an average <strong>of</strong> threesurgeries (1-6) in 37 hips. Seven different methods <strong>of</strong> constrained liner fixation were observed.Eight different <strong>the</strong>oretical failure mechanisms were identified: six are mechanical devicefailures at each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> implant interfaces, infection and catastrophic polyethylene wear being <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r two.Results:Average time to failure was 28.4 months (1-78). Several failure mechanisms were operating inmost cases. The predominant mechanism was infection in 12 (28%), type I (failure <strong>of</strong> fixation t<strong>of</strong>ile:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!