11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

coating, have been developed with <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> promoting bone ongrowth <strong>of</strong> cementless femoralstems. These two methods are widely used, and <strong>the</strong> long-term clinical survival rates are 66% to100% at a 10-year follow-up. 7–9 In <strong>the</strong> dental field, acid etching and anodized surfacemodification methods have recently been developed to enhance osseointegration. Etching withstrong acids, such as HCl, H 2 SO 4 , HNO 3 , and HF, is used to modify <strong>the</strong> surface <strong>of</strong> Ti dentalimplants, and results in micro pits on <strong>the</strong> Ti surface with diameters in <strong>the</strong> range 0.5 – 2 μm. 10,11Such etching has been shown to greatly enhance osseointegration. 12 Micro-arc oxidation(MAO) leads to nanoporous pits, thick oxide layers, and <strong>the</strong> incorporation <strong>of</strong> calcium andphosphorus into <strong>the</strong> coating layer, which results in improved osteoblast cell responses. 6,13–15The TiO 2 layer generated by <strong>the</strong> MAO treatment has been found to significantly improve <strong>the</strong>cellular activities <strong>of</strong> Ti in vitro, as well as <strong>the</strong> bone-implant bonding properties in vivo. 16–18Clearly, <strong>the</strong>re are many potential candidates for <strong>the</strong> “optimal” surface <strong>of</strong> a cementless implant;however, <strong>the</strong>re is a lack <strong>of</strong> comparative data. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to provide abiomechanical comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> implant osteointegration <strong>of</strong> four surface modifications to <strong>the</strong>Ti alloy Ti6Al4V: machined, grit-blasted, acid etched (SLA), and MAO.Materials and Methods1. Specimen PreparationWe used 32 Ti6Al4V discs, measuring 4 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length, to create eightspecimens <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four different surface modifications. Grit blasting was achieved usingAl 2 O 3 particles with a diameter <strong>of</strong> 200 – 500 μm in a high-velocity air stream (KSSA-5FD;Kumkang Tech, Seoul, Korea). The roughness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> grit-blasted specimens was in <strong>the</strong> range 5– 7 μm. The SLA specimens were prepared by grit blasting with 200 – 500-μm-diameterparticles and subsequent acid etching with HCl/H 2 SO 4 , as used in clinical practice. To create<strong>the</strong> MAO specimens, <strong>the</strong> Ti6Al4V discs were placed in an electrolytic bath, forming <strong>the</strong> anodes,and stainless steel plates were used as cathodes. The Ti6Al4V plates were ground with abrasivepapers, ultrasonically washed with acetone and distilled water, and dried at 40°C. A freshelectrolyte was prepared by dissolving reagent-grade Ca (CH 3 COO) 2 · H 2 O (6.3 g L −1 ),Ca(H 2 PO 4 ) 2 · H 2 O (13.2 g L −1 ), EDTA-2Na (15 g L −1 ), and NaOH (15 g L −1 ) in deionizedwater. The applied voltage, frequency, duty cycle, and oxidizing time were 230 V, 600 Hz, 8%,and 5 minutes, respectively. All implants were packed and sterilized using gamma radiation.The highest surface roughness (Ra values) was that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MAO group (mean ± standarddeviation, 6.5 ± 0.13 μm), followed by grit blasted (5.0 ± 0.24 μm), SLA (3.1 ± 0.11 μm), andmachined (1.8 ± 0.13 μm). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (JEOL JSM-6700F;JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) were used to examine <strong>the</strong> surface morphologies. The grit-blastedsurface was finely textured (Fig. 1A). The SLA surfaces showed 1 – 2-μm micropits but no pore(Fig. 1B). The MAO surface showed a multilayered porosity <strong>of</strong> 0.6 – 7.1 μm (average, 3.0 μm)(Fig. 1C).2. Surgical ProceduresEight full-grown beagles over 15 kg in body mass (16.5 ± 0.75 kg) were assigned as <strong>the</strong>experimental subjects. The animals were purchased from <strong>the</strong> Orient Bio Company (Sungnam,Korea). All experimental procedures were approved by <strong>the</strong> “Animal Experimental Committee<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Catholic University <strong>of</strong> Korea”. There was a one-week-long adaptation period before <strong>the</strong>experiment began. The operations were performed after intravenously administered generalanes<strong>the</strong>sia. Painting and draping was carried out using aseptic techniques after <strong>the</strong> skinpreparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> thigh. The femur shaft metaphysic was obtained by <strong>the</strong> anterolateral approachresecting <strong>the</strong> femoral iliotibial band and <strong>the</strong> musculus vastus lateralis, and meticuloushemostasis was performed. A 4‑mm-diameter drill was used to create a recess in <strong>the</strong> lateralcortical bone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> femur; and <strong>the</strong> hole was drilled with caution in order to avoid medialfile:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!