11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A modified titanium spinal pedicle screw 4.5 mm diameter, 35 mm length, marked with two 1.0mm tantalum beads, one inside <strong>the</strong> head and one near <strong>the</strong> screw tip was inserted into a bovinetibia segment. Six additional 1.0 mm tantalum beads were inserted into <strong>the</strong> bonesegment superiorly, distally and adjacent to <strong>the</strong> pedicle screw.The phantom was placed on a standard clinical diagnostic imaging bed above a custom RSAcarbon fiber calibration cage (Halifax Biomedical Inc.). A pair <strong>of</strong> DR or CR imaging plateswere placed below <strong>the</strong> calibration cage and irradiated 8 times at 100, 125 kV at 2.5 mAs. ForDR additional test were performed at 150 kV, and again at 100 kV at 0.5 mAs. At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong>abstract submission CR results at <strong>the</strong>se settings were not available.To determine precision, <strong>the</strong> standard deviation <strong>of</strong> 3D vector distances between beads wasdetermined using RSA for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different imaging parameters.ResultsStandard deviations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inter-bead distances measured in <strong>the</strong> pedicle screw were 44.4 and32.1 µm (N=8) respectively for <strong>the</strong> 100 and 125 kV settings at 2.5 mAs using <strong>the</strong> DR system,compared to 109.0, 55.8 µm for CR [Fig. 1]. The distances between <strong>the</strong> bone implanted beadsprovided standard deviations <strong>of</strong> 24.4 and 22.7 µm respectively for <strong>the</strong> 100 and 125 kV settingsat 2.5 mAs using <strong>the</strong> DR system, compared to 33.1 and 33.0 µm with <strong>the</strong> CR system. Fur<strong>the</strong>rincreasing <strong>the</strong> photon energy to 150 kV with <strong>the</strong> DR system reduces <strong>the</strong> precision error to 22.4µm in <strong>the</strong> pedicle screw and remains approximately <strong>the</strong> same at 21.0 µm in bone. Lowering <strong>the</strong>mAs while maintaining 100 kV increases <strong>the</strong> precision error in <strong>the</strong> pedicle screw (64 µm) andshowed no significant difference in bone (24.4 µm).ConclusionThe current phantom design is basic in nature and does not account for any s<strong>of</strong>t tissue scatter.However, initial results indicate a considerable reduction in precision error when using DRcompared to CR imaging equipment for RSA analysis. Increasing <strong>the</strong> kV did not significantlyinfluence <strong>the</strong> precision in measuring bead locations in bone. For embedded tantalum beadswithin a titanium pedicle screw, imaging at higher kV values with <strong>the</strong> described DR imagingsystem did allow more precise localization. This approach may be useful in assessing <strong>the</strong> invivo position <strong>of</strong> spine or o<strong>the</strong>r titanium implants.FiguresThursday, October 7, 2010, 16:30-17:20Session A8: Peripros<strong>the</strong>tic Fractures in THAPeripros<strong>the</strong>tic Fractures Around Exeter Stems: A New Injury?*Jonathan Phillips - Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals - Nottingham,UKChris Boulton - Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham - Nottingham, UKfile:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!