11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

lactide interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament surgery and in future if <strong>the</strong>re will bemore reports about such complication, it will be a place for debating bio screws usage.Poster: 68Change <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Femoral Offset (FO) and CCD Angle After Implantation <strong>the</strong>Short-Stem Pro<strong>the</strong>sis in Total Hip Arthroplasty*Khalaf Moussa - Westpfalz Teaching Hospital - Kusel, Germany*Email: kmoussa@gmx.deBackground:The relationship between <strong>the</strong> femral <strong>of</strong>fset(FO) and <strong>the</strong> abductor moment arm and<strong>the</strong> polyethylene wear ,loosening ,instability,persistant limp due to gluteus mediusinsufficiency, even dislocation ,leg discripancy are well known. The short stem pro<strong>the</strong>sis arerecently itroduced as a bone saving procedure which allows later easy and save revision. Incontrast to modular neck system which proved to be useful for <strong>the</strong> correction <strong>of</strong> antevertedfemur ,<strong>the</strong> short stem pro<strong>the</strong>sis did not posses this advantage which may consequently affect <strong>the</strong>long term results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pro<strong>the</strong>sis .We study <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> using a short stem series (NANOS-Smith and Nephew)on <strong>the</strong> hip geometry concerning <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fset and CCD angle change after implantationMaterial and methods: From juli 2005 to march 2009 a total <strong>of</strong> 113 (70 males,53female) uncemented Nanos-short-stem pro<strong>the</strong>sis were implanted in 100 patients.The patiensaverage age was 53 years (33-73 ). The indication for this procedure was predominantlycoxaarthrosis. In all cases a minimal invasive posterior approach was used. The patients wereassessed using Harris Hip Score and radiologically (true ap-axial) to determine CCD angle,Offset, any bone changes , <strong>the</strong> stand <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pro<strong>the</strong>sis and peri-articular ossifications. Thecontralateral hip was used as a parameter. Patients with severe osteoarthritis ,malformations orprevious operation were excluded from <strong>the</strong> study.Results: The perioperative Harris Hip Score was 53 (28-77), postoperative was 94 (86-100).Radiological follow up examinations showed an increased femoral neck <strong>of</strong>fset preoperative50.01mm (39-68),postoperative 55.8 (42-72). Also <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> CCD angle changed and inmost cases were associated with increased angle.There is no evidence <strong>of</strong> any loosing ormigration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pro<strong>the</strong>sis. Calcification was noted in 8 cases (Grad 1), 4 cases(Grad 2), 1 case(Grad 3). No luxation was observed.file:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!