11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

this system. The 81 patients with more than 2 year follow-up have been re-examined.Complications have been recorded. The clinical results have been analyzed according to <strong>the</strong>Knee Society Scoring System. The subjective results have been analyzed with <strong>the</strong> Oxford KneeQuestionnaire. The accuracy <strong>of</strong> implantation has been analyzed on post-operative anteroposteriorand lateral long leg X-rays. The 2-year survival rate has been calculated.RESULTS: We observed 8 complications related to <strong>the</strong> implant or <strong>the</strong> operative technique : 2cases <strong>of</strong> meniscus instability (1 revision to TKR, 1 bearing exchange); 2 cases <strong>of</strong> tibia loosening(revised to TKR), 2 cases <strong>of</strong> femoral loosening (revised to TKR), 1 case <strong>of</strong> lateral diseaseprogression ( revised to TKR), 1 case <strong>of</strong> unexplained pain syndrome (revised to TKR).The mean Knee Score was 93 points, 44% had <strong>the</strong> maximum <strong>of</strong> 100 points, and only 10% haveless than 85 points. The mean pain score was 48 points/50. The mean flexion angle was 128°,and 60% had at least 130° <strong>of</strong> knee flexion. The mean Function Score was 97 points, 84% have<strong>the</strong> maximum <strong>of</strong> 100 points, and only 5% had less than 85 points. The mean Oxford KneeQuestionnaire score was 19 points (best result: 12 points, worst result: 60 points).Expected limb axis correction was obtained in 77% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cases. 62% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cases had anoptimally implanted pros<strong>the</strong>sis for all studied criteria. The 2-year survival rate was 97%.DISCUSSION: Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> revision cases were related to technical difficulties during <strong>the</strong>development phase. Fixation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> implant has been improved, and some imprecise steps <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>s<strong>of</strong>tware have been corrected. Since <strong>the</strong>se changes occurred, no severe early complicationrelated to implant or s<strong>of</strong>tware has been observed. The current implant is considered reliable, and<strong>the</strong> current minimal invasive navigated technique is considered reliable as well.FiguresFigure 1Thursday, October 7, 2010, 7:30-8:20Session B1: Computer Navigation in TKANavigated Total Knee Pros<strong>the</strong>sis Exchange. a Comparative Study WithConventional Technique.*Jean-Yves Jenny - University Hospital Strasbourg - Illkirch, FranceYann Diesinger - University Hospital Strasbourg - Illkirch, France*Email: Jean-yves.jenny@chru-strasbourg.frINTRODUCTION: Revision total knee replacement (TKR) is a challenging procedure,file:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!