11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>the</strong> alignment accuracy and repeatability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> instrument. Although, <strong>the</strong> results in this studyare very promising, it is recognized that this was a small patient sample and controlled use byone surgeon. It is recommended that more studies be conducted <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alignment system in <strong>the</strong>hands <strong>of</strong> additional surgeon evaluators and on <strong>the</strong>ir patient populations.FiguresPoster: 18Minimum 25 Years Follow-Up <strong>of</strong> a Cementless Hip Stem: Definitive Results<strong>of</strong> Our 300 First CLS*Gianluca Cusma' Guatteri - HUMANITAS CLINICAL INSTITUTE - Rozzano, ITALYGuido Grappiolo - HUMANITAS CLINICAL INSTITUTE - ROZZANO, ITALY*Email: g.cdg@libero.itHigh survival rates have been reported for <strong>the</strong> uncemented CLS Spotorno stem in previouspublications by <strong>the</strong> designer’s surgery team. Analogous results were reported by severalindipendent works in which this stem was implanted, also in combination with different cups.To investigate <strong>the</strong> real longevity <strong>of</strong> this stem we performed an update <strong>of</strong> our follow-up (<strong>the</strong> lastwas published in 2003): in this work we report <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> first consecutive 299 patients(300 hips) in which <strong>the</strong> first generation CLS stem was implanted between 1983 and 1985, witha resulting minimum follow-up period <strong>of</strong> 25 years.We retrospectively evaluated radiographic and clinical results (by Harris hip score) <strong>of</strong> availablepatients. In order to obtain overall survival curves, we considered revision (or indication torevision) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stem as <strong>the</strong> end point <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> survival curve; patients who died with a wellfunctioning hip were not considered as failures; in only 1 case a patient deceased with apendant indication to revision. This way we found a trend comparable to our previous curvespublished in 2003.We also elaborated survival curves with asepting loosening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stem as <strong>the</strong> only end point: inthis case we obtained a 95% isolated survival rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stem at 25 years (95% conï¬denceinterval, 91%–97%). Clinical scores definitively loose its importance at so long term follow-up(due to cup revision surgeries outcomes), anyway our median Harris hip score was 82 points.Surprisingly no thigh pain was reported in avalaible patients and no distal femoral osteolysiswas found in radiograms we could evaluate.The long-term survival <strong>of</strong> our CLS stem series favorably compares with o<strong>the</strong>r similar studiesfile:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!