11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

*Stephen Murphy - New England Baptist Hospital - Boston, USA*Email: stephenbmurphymd@gmail.comImproving Cup Positioning Using a Mechanical Navigation InstrumentSimon D. Steppacher MD 2 , Jens H. Kowal PhD 2 , Stephen B. Murphy MD 11 Center for Computer Assisted and Reconstructive Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital,Boston, University <strong>of</strong> Bern, Bern Switzerland 2Acetabular component malpositioning is <strong>the</strong> most common reason for instability and wearresulting in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The current study aimed to assess a novelmechanical navigation device which was designed to simply and efficiently indicate appropriatecup orientation during surgery. The accuracy was compared to a series <strong>of</strong> hip arthroplastiesperformed using CT-based computer-assisted cup placement.The study group consisted <strong>of</strong> 70 THAs performed using <strong>the</strong> mechanical device. The controlgroup consisted <strong>of</strong> 146 THAs performed using CT-based computer navigation. Postoperativecup positioning was measured using a validated 2D/3D-matching method. An outlier wasdefined outside a range <strong>of</strong> ± 10 degrees from <strong>the</strong> planned inclination or anteversion.In <strong>the</strong> study group <strong>the</strong> mean accuracy for inclination was 1.3 ± 3.4 (-6.6 – 8.2) and 1.0 ± 4.1 (-8.8 – 9.5) for anteversion with no outliers for ei<strong>the</strong>r parameter. In <strong>the</strong> control group <strong>the</strong> accuracyfor anteversion (3.0 ± 5.8 [-11.8 - 19.6]; p=0.6%) and <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> outliers (6.8%; p=3.3%)differed significantly. The accuracy for inclination (3.5 ± 4.1 [-12.7 - 9.5]; p=21.4%) and <strong>the</strong>percentage <strong>of</strong> ouliers (4.8%; p=9.9%) did not differ significantly.The use <strong>of</strong> this mechanical navigation device can result in similar accuracy <strong>of</strong> acetabular cuporientation compared with CT-based surgical navigation. All cups were placed within a zone <strong>of</strong>± 10 degree range <strong>of</strong> inclination and anteversion. This mechanical navigation device allowsaccurate cup navigation with minimal additional time and equipment.Friday, October 8, 2010, 16:30-17:30Session B15: MIS Techniques in TKAProspective Comparison <strong>of</strong> Total Hip Arthoplasty Performed UsingConventional and Tissue-Preserving Techniques: A Minimum 2-YearOutcome StudySimon Steppacher - New England Baptist Hospital - Boston, USAMoritz Tannast - ctr for computer assisted and reconstructive surgery - boston, usafile:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!