Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

35. Scuderi GR: Revision total knee arthroplasty. How much constraint is enough? ClinOrthop Relat Res. 2001;392:300-305.36. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM: Insall Award paper.Why are knee replacements failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7-13.37. Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robotassistedtotal knee replacement. Knee. 2002;9:173-180.38. Sierra RJ, Cooney WP 4th, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Rand JA. Reoperations after3200 revision TKAs: rates, etiology, and lessons learned. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;425:200-206.39. Stone R, McCloy R. Ergonomics in medicine and surgery. BMJ. 2004;328:1115-1118.40. Stulberg SD. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res.2003;416:177-184.41. Teter, KE, Bergman, D, Colwell, CW. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullarytibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1995;321:106-110.42. The Department of Health. Risk assessment for transmission of vCJD via surgicalinstruments: A modelling approach and numerical scenarios. Available at:http://www.dh.gov.uk/ Accessed 19 July 2005.43. 3D Systems-the solid imaging company. Sinterstation HiQ Series SLS systems. Availableat: http://www.3dsystems.com/ Accessed 19 July 2005.44. Werner FW, Ayers DC, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ. The effect of valgus/varusmalalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech. 2005;38:349-355.45. Stullberg, S., Picard, F. & Saragaglia, D. (2000) Computer assisted total kneereplacement arthroplasty. Operative Techniques inOrthopaedics, 10, 25-39.FiguresFigure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3Poster: 32Pelvic Flexion / Extension and Its Impact on Functional AcetabularAlignment and Stability Following Total Hip Replacement*Mahmoud Hafez - October 6th - Cairo, Egyptfile:///E|/ISTA2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]