11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ing superior clinical results when combined with porous coated substrate. In our study,though <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> massive polyethylene wear and intrapelvic giant osteolysis could not berevealed, <strong>the</strong> porous cup with AW-GC bottom coating was well fixed and gained boneingrowthat <strong>the</strong> porous surface <strong>under</strong> osteolytic conditions, which may demonstrate <strong>the</strong> longtermdurability <strong>of</strong> this surface treatment.Friday, October 8, 2010, 7:30-8:30Session B9: Complications in ArthroplastyManagement <strong>of</strong> Unstable Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Dual MobilityCupIntroduction:*Olivier Guyen - Edouard Herriot Hospital - Lyon, FranceChristophe Chevillotte - Edouard Herriot Hospital - LYON, FRANCEJulien Wegrzyn - Edouard Herriot Hospital - LYON, FRANCEVincent Pibarot - Edouard Herriot Hospital - LYON, FRANCEJacques Bejui-Hugues - ICOT - Latina, ITALYJean-Paul Carret - Edouard Herriot Hospital - LYON, FRANCE*Email: oguyen@hotmail.comReoperations to manage unstable total hip arthroplasty are reported with a high failure rate. Thedual mobility cup (figure 1) (mobile polyethylene component between <strong>the</strong> pros<strong>the</strong>tic head and<strong>the</strong> outer metal shell) is a useful option in such cases. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this retrospective studywas to assess <strong>the</strong> clinical and radiologic features associated with <strong>the</strong> dual mobility cup.Materials and Methods:Fifty one unstable total hip arthroplasties (32 females, 19 males) were revised using a dualmobility socket at our institution between March 2000 and February 2005.Mean age at reoperation was 67 year old (range, 35 to 98). The outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> revisionprocedure was assessed using <strong>the</strong> Harris Hip Score, and complications were determined bydetailed review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> patient’s records. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> involvedjoint were reviewed to assess <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pros<strong>the</strong>sis and to look for osteolysis and signs<strong>of</strong> loosening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> implant.Results:Mean follow-up was 4 years (range, 2 to 6.7). At last review 4 patients had died and one waslost to follow up. Postoperatively <strong>the</strong>re was a significant improvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Harris Hip Score.Fifty patients (98%) had no fur<strong>the</strong>r episodes <strong>of</strong> dislocation. There were 3 revisions for deepinfection, and 2 for dissociation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bipolar component. No cup required a revision foraseptic loosening. No radiolucent lines around <strong>the</strong> components and no osteolysis were observedat latest follow up.file:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!