08.12.2016 Views

Australia Yearbook - 2001

Australia Yearbook - 2001

Australia Yearbook - 2001

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3—International relations 109<br />

importance than South Asia, with Indonesia<br />

overtaking India as the second largest recipient<br />

of aid. Progressively <strong>Australia</strong>n aid became no<br />

longer tied to countries that were members of<br />

the British Commonwealth.<br />

Today Papua New Guinea, the South Pacific and<br />

East Asia (in particular Indonesia, Viet Nam and<br />

the Philippines) feature prominently in <strong>Australia</strong>’s<br />

aid program, as shown in table 3.5.<br />

Initially <strong>Australia</strong>n aid was composed<br />

predominantly of bilateral assistance. In the<br />

1960s cooperation between donor countries<br />

became established as a range of development<br />

agencies were formed, including the OECD’s<br />

Development Assistance Committee (DAC), a<br />

number of new United Nations agencies and the<br />

Asian Development Bank (ADB). In the early<br />

1970s about 7% of <strong>Australia</strong>n aid was provided<br />

to multilateral organisations, whereas now over<br />

a quarter of <strong>Australia</strong>n aid is allocated to them.<br />

Originally the aid program was administered by<br />

several government departments, including the<br />

Department of External Territories, the<br />

Department of Foreign Affairs and the<br />

Departments of Education and Treasury,<br />

reflecting the ad hoc nature of the program.<br />

In the early 1970s, in recognition of the need for<br />

stronger policy direction and coordination, along<br />

with Papua New Guinea achieving independence,<br />

a single government agency was set up to<br />

administer the aid program. First known as the<br />

<strong>Australia</strong>n Development Assistance Agency<br />

(ADAA) then the <strong>Australia</strong>n Development<br />

Assistance Bureau and later as the <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

International Development Assistance Bureau,<br />

it has evolved into the <strong>Australia</strong>n Agency for<br />

International Development (AusAID).<br />

Over the past twenty years, several reviews of<br />

the <strong>Australia</strong>n aid program have been<br />

undertaken. In 1984 the Minister for Foreign<br />

Affairs commissioned the Jackson Review. The<br />

Review led to a stronger focus on partnerships<br />

with recipient countries through a country<br />

program approach. Instead of selecting<br />

individual projects, country programs were<br />

developed which considered the development<br />

priorities of recipient governments and<br />

<strong>Australia</strong>’s capacity to assist. Cooperative<br />

relationships were established, with both<br />

recipient and donor governments involved in<br />

the planning and implementation of country<br />

programs. The three agreed principal objectives<br />

for aid stemming from the Jackson Review were<br />

humanitarian assistance, support for <strong>Australia</strong>’s<br />

strategic interests and promotion of <strong>Australia</strong>’s<br />

commercial position. In addition the then<br />

Government decided on a geographic focus on<br />

Papua New Guinea, the South Pacific and<br />

South-East Asia, as well as a new sectoral focus<br />

including agriculture, infrastructure<br />

development, health, population planning and<br />

urban development.<br />

In 1996 the Simons Review was commissioned<br />

by the Minister of Foreign Affairs. This led to the<br />

adoption of a single clear objective for the aid<br />

program: to advance <strong>Australia</strong>’s national interest<br />

by assisting developing countries to reduce<br />

poverty and achieve sustainable development.<br />

The Government decided that Papua New<br />

Guinea, the Pacific and East Asia would continue<br />

to be high priorities for <strong>Australia</strong>n assistance. It<br />

was also decided that health, education, rural<br />

development and governance would be the<br />

priority sectors, in addition to two issues that<br />

cut across the development process: the<br />

promotion of gender equity and the<br />

maximisation of environmental sustainability.<br />

The Government’s response to the Simons<br />

Review strengthened the partnership approach<br />

emphasised in the Jackson Review, noting that<br />

effective partnerships with developing countries<br />

formed the core of <strong>Australia</strong>’s aid program.<br />

Apart from understanding the need for a<br />

better-targeted and focused aid program there<br />

was also a significant emphasis, in the<br />

Government’s response to the Simons Review,<br />

on improving the quality of the program. This<br />

included support for a more vigorous focus on<br />

defining strategic and program objectives as<br />

well as on allowing better performance<br />

measurement and reporting on aid quality.<br />

The network of <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

diplomatic and consular<br />

missions overseas<br />

DFAT manages an extensive network of<br />

<strong>Australia</strong>n diplomatic and consular missions<br />

abroad (tables 3.7 to 3.10), supporting <strong>Australia</strong>’s<br />

international interests and providing consular<br />

and passport services. The department’s central<br />

office is in Canberra and it also maintains offices<br />

in all of the State capitals and in Darwin, as well<br />

as Newcastle and Thursday Island.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!