08.12.2016 Views

Australia Yearbook - 2001

Australia Yearbook - 2001

Australia Yearbook - 2001

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

832 Year Book <strong>Australia</strong> <strong>2001</strong><br />

possibility of deregulation and privatisation had<br />

frequently been discussed within <strong>Australia</strong>.<br />

However concerns, particularly the need to<br />

maintain an adequate and equitable standard of<br />

services for all <strong>Australia</strong>ns regardless of locality,<br />

had always prevented the topic from<br />

proceeding to a policy level.<br />

With these developments in the world<br />

telecommunications market new concerns began<br />

to arise within <strong>Australia</strong>—concerns that <strong>Australia</strong><br />

would be unable to remain competitive in the<br />

new economy unless it changed the structure of<br />

its communications industry. Market growth was<br />

necessary, and it was the opinion of an increasing<br />

number that the introduction of competition was<br />

the best way to achieve this. Yet this would<br />

require sweeping changes to the established<br />

industry, changes that carried with them a great<br />

deal of risk. If competition was introduced too<br />

quickly, and without due care, there was a<br />

genuine possibility that new entrants would<br />

flounder, causing the entire <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

telecommunications industry to become<br />

dangerously destabilised. Caution was warranted.<br />

Mindful of this, in 1991 the Government passed a<br />

new Telecommunications Act. The Act<br />

introduced changes to the <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

telecommunications industry designed, all things<br />

going well, to eventually lead to the opening of<br />

the market to full-scale competition. As part of<br />

these changes Telecom and OTC were merged to<br />

form a single government player, the <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation,<br />

renamed Telstra in 1993. In addition, after a long<br />

bidding process for a second<br />

telecommunications licence, a single private<br />

player, Optus, was allowed to enter the <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

telecommunications marketplace for national<br />

long distance and international telephone calls.<br />

Certain measures were set in place to enable<br />

Optus to gain a foothold beside the incumbent<br />

giant, including guaranteed access to Telecom’s<br />

existing infrastructure on reasonable terms. All<br />

other players would be prevented from entering<br />

the general telephone market until 1997, at<br />

which time a thorough review of the effect of<br />

competition on the market would be completed.<br />

This began the Telecom/Optus duopoly that<br />

would dominate the <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

telecommunications industry for the rest of the<br />

decade.<br />

Over the next few years further steps towards<br />

open competition were made. Optus began<br />

using its own infrastructure from 1993. On the<br />

recommendation of Austel, the independent<br />

industry regulator introduced in 1990, Vodafone<br />

was permitted to enter the mobile telephony<br />

market with an exclusively digital licence in 1992.<br />

This added a third player to the emerging mobile<br />

industry, as Telecom had been providing mobile<br />

services since 1987 and Optus had been allowed<br />

to buy AUSSAT’s assets and begin mobile<br />

telephony as part of the general duopoly deal of<br />

1991. It also laid the ground work for the<br />

compulsory conversion to digital technology<br />

currently taking place across the<br />

industry—Vodafone agreed to accept the<br />

exclusively digital licence on the sole proviso that<br />

the analogue mobile system being used at the<br />

time would eventually be phased out, placing it<br />

on equal footing with the major players.<br />

All of these gradual changes had one principal<br />

aim: to test the waters of competition in the<br />

<strong>Australia</strong>n telecommunications industry in a<br />

carefully monitored and relatively stable<br />

environment. The 1991 Act declared that if a<br />

review pronounced the experiment a success<br />

full-scale competition would be introduced by<br />

1997. As 1997 rolled round the review was<br />

completed, giving a positive, if slightly tentative,<br />

verdict. Optus had suffered some difficult<br />

periods struggling against the marketplace<br />

dominance of Telstra, but was now performing<br />

strongly. Telecommunications had become the<br />

fastest growing industry in <strong>Australia</strong>.<br />

On 1 July 1997, the industry was opened up to<br />

full competition. All limitations on the number<br />

of licensed players were removed and<br />

anti-competitive conduct was prohibited.<br />

Telecommunications regulation was aligned<br />

with general competition law, with the<br />

<strong>Australia</strong>n Competition and Consumer<br />

Commission overseeing competition policy<br />

regulation across all sectors. The <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

Communications Authority still provided some<br />

technical regulation, but the main emphasis was<br />

on encouraging industry self-regulation. The<br />

<strong>Australia</strong>n Communications Industry Forum was<br />

established as an industry body to facilitate and<br />

manage this regulation, including the<br />

development of codes of practice and technical<br />

standards. To allay concerns regarding the<br />

maintenance of service standards, legislative<br />

safety nets were introduced, ensuring that the<br />

Universal Service Obligations that had always<br />

applied to Telstra would now also apply to the<br />

new telecommunications providers. These<br />

obligations aim to guarantee the rights of end<br />

users and ensure that the lucrative urban<br />

market is not developed at the expense of the<br />

rural market.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!