08.12.2016 Views

Australia Yearbook - 2001

Australia Yearbook - 2001

Australia Yearbook - 2001

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

644 Year Book <strong>Australia</strong> <strong>2001</strong><br />

The recent decline in the underlying demand for<br />

wool reflects changes in lifestyle (such as the<br />

trend to more informal, easy-care clothing), and<br />

the increasing competition from other fibres,<br />

particularly high quality synthetic fibres. On top<br />

of this, economic upheaval in many countries<br />

traditionally considered to be large purchasers of<br />

wool (particularly the Asian economies) has<br />

resulted in limited demand for wool. These<br />

factors, together with a very large supply of wool<br />

left over from the high production of the late<br />

1980s and early 1990s, have resulted in a dramatic<br />

fall in the price of wool in recent years. However,<br />

this fall appears to have reached the bottom, with<br />

wool prices generally improving in the first half of<br />

2000. Reasons for this include a reduction in the<br />

quality of stored wool and an increase in demand.<br />

Demand for wool has traditionally been a cyclical<br />

phenomenon, determined largely by economic<br />

cycles and world wide trends in clothing fashion.<br />

Attempts to minimise the damaging effect of<br />

these short term cycles on the income of<br />

woolgrowers have been in place for many years.<br />

In 1970 a reserve price scheme was introduced,<br />

the original intention of which was to protect<br />

wool growers from severe short term price<br />

reductions caused by fluctuations in the demand<br />

for wool. A minimum reserve price was<br />

introduced in 1974 to provide growers with a<br />

guaranteed minimum price for their wool. The<br />

scheme was funded by a proportion of the tax<br />

paid by growers on the value of shorn wool, and<br />

was administered by the <strong>Australia</strong>n Wool<br />

Corporation (AWC), which purchased all wool<br />

not meeting the minimum reserve price at<br />

auction. This wool was later sold during periods<br />

of higher prices.<br />

The reserve price scheme worked well for about<br />

20 years. However a combination of a sharp fall in<br />

demand and a high reserve price (set during a<br />

period of high demand in the late 1980s), resulted<br />

in the scheme being suspended in February 1991,<br />

when the size of the AWC stockpile had reached<br />

4.7 million bales. The Government, with the<br />

agreement of the industry, decided that the<br />

scheme could no longer be maintained.<br />

The <strong>Australia</strong>n Wool Realisation Commission<br />

(AWRC) was initially responsible for the disposal<br />

of the wool stockpile. In December 1993 the<br />

disposal of the stockpile became the<br />

responsibility of Wool International (WI), a<br />

statutory corporation of the Commonwealth<br />

Government. WI was required to sell the<br />

stockpile in accordance with a statutory imposed<br />

disposal schedule, the last bale of stockpile wool<br />

to be disposed of by 31 December 2000. At<br />

30 June 1998, under the management of WI, the<br />

stockpile had been reduced to 1.2 million bales.<br />

By October 1998, equity in the wool stockpile had<br />

reached a level significantly higher than the wool<br />

debt, and therefore ongoing government<br />

involvement in stockpile management was no<br />

longer justified. On 15 October 1998 the<br />

Commonwealth Government announced a freeze<br />

on sales of wool from the stockpile, and an<br />

intention to privatise WI by 1 July 1999. On this<br />

date WI became WoolStock <strong>Australia</strong> Limited, a<br />

public company limited by shares allocated to<br />

previous holders of units of equity in WI.<br />

WoolStock <strong>Australia</strong> took over the assets and<br />

liabilities from WI and is fully accountable to its<br />

shareholders for the efficient management and<br />

sale of the stockpile. The principal activities of<br />

WoolStock are selling the stockpile, and making<br />

distributions to unit/share holders. There is no<br />

fixed schedule of stockpile disposal as such<br />

decisions can now be taken on a purely<br />

commercial basis and in the interests of<br />

WoolStock’s shareholders. As of 31 January 2000,<br />

the wool stockpile consisted of 927,000 bales of<br />

unsold wool.<br />

A second reform process is currently underway to<br />

replace the <strong>Australia</strong>n Wool Research and<br />

Promotion Organisation (AWRAP) with private<br />

sector arrangements with a target date of<br />

1 January <strong>2001</strong>. Following the continuing low<br />

demand and prices for wool and a successful ‘no<br />

confidence’ motion in the Board of AWRAP (in<br />

November 1998), the wool industry Future<br />

Directions Taskforce was established to<br />

undertake a major inquiry into the future of the<br />

<strong>Australia</strong>n wool industry. The Taskforce<br />

presented its findings in June 1999. While most of<br />

the recommendations of the Taskforce report<br />

were focused on individual farm businesses and<br />

what they can do to improve their profitability,<br />

there were recommendations for government to<br />

consider, including the future of AWRAP and<br />

wool tax arrangements. On 23 September 1999,<br />

the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and<br />

Forestry announced an Eight Point Plan for<br />

progressing those recommendations of the<br />

Taskforce report that related to industry services<br />

and levy arrangements. A key element of the Plan<br />

was to conduct a grower ballot (WoolPoll 2000)<br />

to give woolgrowers the opportunity to vote on<br />

their preferences for future industry services and<br />

associated wool tax arrangements. The final result<br />

of WoolPoll 2000, released on 6 April 2000,<br />

showed 61% of votes, based on an optional<br />

preferential voting system, supporting the 2%<br />

service model.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!