08.12.2016 Views

Australia Yearbook - 2001

Australia Yearbook - 2001

Australia Yearbook - 2001

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 27—Government finance 919<br />

Local governments also provide transport<br />

facilities, hospitals, charitable institutions,<br />

recreation grounds, parks, swimming pools,<br />

libraries, museums and other business<br />

undertakings.<br />

Local governments’ own-source revenue is<br />

derived mainly from property taxes. They also<br />

rely on grants from the Commonwealth and their<br />

parent State Governments. The <strong>Australia</strong>n Capital<br />

Territory has no separate local government.<br />

Multi-jurisdictional<br />

Universities are classified to a ‘multi-jurisdictional’<br />

category, because of the combined role of the<br />

Commonwealth and State Governments in their<br />

financing and control. No other units are<br />

currently classified as multi-jurisdictional.<br />

Accrual-based Government Finance Statistics<br />

The <strong>Australia</strong>n system for producing GFS was<br />

changed during 1999–2000 because of the<br />

adoption of accrual accounting by governments<br />

and the revision of international statistical<br />

standards. As a result, a new conceptual<br />

framework was introduced, in the form of an<br />

integrated statement of stocks and flows, in<br />

place of the old cash-based framework. This<br />

new framework allows a more comprehensive<br />

assessment of the economic impact of<br />

government activity and the sustainability of<br />

fiscal policy. It also provides an improved basis<br />

for monitoring efficiency in the allocation and<br />

use of government resources.<br />

The new framework is divided into a number of<br />

separate statements (Operating Statement,<br />

Statement of Stocks and Flows, Balance Sheet,<br />

and Cash Flow Statement), each of which<br />

focuses on analytical aggregates or balances of<br />

particular interest to users of GFS.<br />

The following statements are presented in this<br />

chapter for the total public and general<br />

government sectors for all <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

governments combined, and for the State and<br />

local government levels:<br />

the Operating Statement;<br />

the Cash Flow Statement; and<br />

the Balance Sheet.<br />

The remainder of this article discusses the<br />

accrual-based analytical measures highlighted in<br />

these statements, the classifications used in the<br />

compilation of GFS and the main differences<br />

between the former cash-based and the new<br />

accrual-based GFS.<br />

Analytical measures<br />

The accrual GFS analytical balances are set out<br />

below.<br />

Net Operating Balance (NOB)<br />

The GFS NOB is calculated as transactions in GFS<br />

revenues less transactions in GFS expenses. It<br />

measures (in accrual terms) the full cost of<br />

providing government services, including<br />

unfunded superannuation and non-cash items<br />

such as depreciation. The NOB is not affected by<br />

revaluations of existing assets, by acquisition or<br />

disposal of assets or by assets recognised in the<br />

Balance Sheet for the first time. This measure is<br />

conceptually equivalent to the concept of ‘Net<br />

savings plus capital transfers’ in the <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

System of National Accounts (ASNA).<br />

When a government’s NOB is positive, it<br />

indicates that surplus funds have been<br />

generated from current operations and these<br />

have resulted in an increase in that<br />

government’s Net Worth. These surplus funds<br />

may be used to acquire assets and/or decrease<br />

liabilities. When a NOB is negative, it indicates<br />

that a shortfall has occurred on current<br />

operations and it has been necessary to incur<br />

liabilities and/or liquidate assets, but it does not<br />

necessarily indicate that a government is a net<br />

borrower. It can therefore be said that a<br />

government’s NOB, which is in an overall<br />

positive balance over a number of periods, such<br />

as an economic cycle, is indicative of the<br />

on-going sustainability of that government’s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!