08.12.2016 Views

Australia Yearbook - 2001

Australia Yearbook - 2001

Australia Yearbook - 2001

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7—Income and welfare 287<br />

C5.5 CHANGES IN INCOME DISTRIBUTION AMONG FAMILIES—1968–69 to 1997–98<br />

1968–69 1997–98 Change, 1968–69 to 1997–98<br />

Income deciles<br />

Income<br />

Share<br />

%<br />

Upper<br />

Bound(a)<br />

$(’97–98)<br />

Income<br />

Share<br />

%<br />

Upper<br />

Bound(a)<br />

$(’97–98)<br />

Income Share<br />

percentage<br />

points<br />

Upper<br />

Bound(a)<br />

$(’97–98)<br />

First 2.2 13 040 1.8 15 030 –1.8 +1 990<br />

Second 4.6 20 000 3.3 19 100 –1.3 –900<br />

Third 6.2 24 200 4.4 26 220 –1.8 +2 020<br />

Fourth 6.9 28 260 6.0 34 180 –0.9 +5 920<br />

Fifth 8.5 32 460 7.6 43 020 –0.9 +10 560<br />

Sixth 9.3 36 820 9.3 51 790 0.0 +14 970<br />

Seventh 10.6 42 030 11.2 62 200 +0.6 +20 170<br />

Eighth 12.2 49 130 13.3 74 000 +1.1 +24 870<br />

Ninth 15.0 62 030 15.3 94 200 +0.3 +32 170<br />

Tenth 24.7 . . 26.8 . . +2.1 . .<br />

P10/P50(b) . . 0.402 . . 0.349 –0.053 . .<br />

P90/P50(b) . . 1.911 . . 2.19 +0.279 . .<br />

P90/P10(b) . . 4.756 . . 6.266 +1.510 . .<br />

Gini coefficient 0.33 0.39 18.2%<br />

Robin Hood<br />

index 22.5 26.6 18.2%<br />

(a) In 1997–98 dollars. Incomes have been deflated using the private final consumption expenditure deflator.<br />

(b) The percentile ratios (P10/P50, etc.) show the ratio of the upper bound income of the first decile (P10) to the fifth decile,<br />

or median (P50), and so on.<br />

Source: CBCS 1973; ABS 1999.<br />

Table C5.6 compares how individuals have fared<br />

since 1968–89 by investigating changes in the<br />

distributions of total incomes (from all sources)<br />

of full-time male and female workers. (It should<br />

be noted that the figures for 1968–69 refer to<br />

full-time, full-year workers, while those for<br />

1997–98 refer to workers who were working<br />

full-time at the time of the survey.) Income<br />

inequality increased among both male and female<br />

full-time workers, with the relative position of<br />

lower-income workers declining and that of<br />

high-income workers improving. The extent of<br />

these changes for males and females was very<br />

similar. By 1997–98, low-income female full-time<br />

workers were equally well off (relative to the<br />

female median) than were low-income males<br />

(relative to the male median). In contrast, the<br />

position of higher-income male workers relative<br />

to the male median was above that of<br />

higher-income female workers, and throughout<br />

the period there was greater inequality in the<br />

male distribution than in the female distribution.<br />

At the same time, there has been a narrowing of<br />

male-female income differentials at all points in<br />

the two distributions since the late 1960s.<br />

Whereas in 1968–69 the median income of<br />

full-time male workers was 67% above that of<br />

the corresponding median female income, by<br />

1997–98 that differential had fallen to 20%.<br />

A more detailed exploration of changes in<br />

income distribution is restricted to the<br />

period since 1981–82, when the ABS income<br />

surveys were regularised and data stored<br />

electronically. There have, however, also<br />

been some changes to the survey<br />

methodology since then, most notably when<br />

the change to a continuous survey was<br />

introduced in 1995. This change has affected<br />

the comparability of some of the data from<br />

the more recent (post-1995) surveys with<br />

those collected in earlier years. The following<br />

analysis minimises the impact of these<br />

changes in survey methodology and<br />

represents the best estimates that can be<br />

produced from the currently available data.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!