12.04.2017 Views

Cambridge International A Level Biology Revision Guide

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter P2: Planning, analysis and evaluation<br />

A key feature to consider is whether you really were<br />

measuring the dependent variable that you intended to<br />

measure. For example, if you were doing a transpiration<br />

experiment using a potometer, were you really measuring<br />

the rate of loss of water vapour from the shoot’s leaves?<br />

The measurement you were making was actually the rate<br />

of uptake of water by the shoot from the potometer. You<br />

should be able to explain why you think (or do not think!)<br />

that this measurement can be relied upon to give you valid<br />

data about the rate of transpiration.<br />

It is important to be able to bring all of this information<br />

together, and to be able to make an informed judgement<br />

about the overall validity of the investigation and how<br />

much it can be trusted for testing the hypothesis. As at<br />

AS level, you should be able to suggest improvements to<br />

the experiment that would increase its reliability.<br />

Statistical<br />

test<br />

When to use it Criteria for using the test Examples of use<br />

How to interpret the<br />

value you calculate<br />

t-test<br />

You want to know<br />

if two sets of<br />

continuous data are<br />

significantly different<br />

from one another.<br />

• You have two sets of continuous,<br />

quantitative data (page 494).<br />

• You have more than 10 but less<br />

than 30 readings for each set of data.<br />

• Both sets of data come from<br />

populations that have normal<br />

distributions.<br />

• The standard deviations for the two<br />

sets of data are very similar.<br />

Are the surface areas of<br />

the leaves on the northfacing<br />

side of a tree<br />

significantly different<br />

from the surface areas on<br />

the south-facing side?<br />

Are the reaction times of<br />

students who have drunk<br />

a caffeine-containing<br />

drink significantly<br />

different from students<br />

who have drunk water?<br />

Use a t-test table to look<br />

up your value of t. If this<br />

value is greater than the<br />

t value for a probability<br />

of 0.05 (the critical value),<br />

then you can say that<br />

your two populations are<br />

significantly different.<br />

χ 2 test<br />

You want to know<br />

if your observed<br />

results differ<br />

significantly from<br />

your expected<br />

results.<br />

• You have two or more sets of<br />

quantitative data, which belong<br />

to two or more discontinuous<br />

categories (i.e. they are nominal<br />

data – page 494)<br />

Are the numbers of<br />

offspring of different<br />

phenotypes obtained<br />

in a genetic cross<br />

significantly different<br />

from the expected<br />

numbers?<br />

Use a χ 2 table to look up<br />

your value of χ 2 . If this<br />

value is greater than the<br />

χ 2 value for a probability<br />

of 0.05, then you can say<br />

that your observed results<br />

differ significantly from<br />

your expected results.<br />

505<br />

Pearsonʼs<br />

linear<br />

correlation<br />

You want to know<br />

if there is a linear<br />

correlation between<br />

two paired sets of<br />

data.<br />

• You have two sets of interval data.<br />

• You have at least 5 pairs of data,<br />

but preferably 10 or more.<br />

• A scatter graph suggests there<br />

might be a linear relationship<br />

between them.<br />

• Both sets of data have an<br />

approximately normal distribution.<br />

Is there a linear<br />

correlation between<br />

the rate of an enzymic<br />

reaction and the<br />

concentration of an<br />

inhibitor?<br />

Is there a linear<br />

correlation between<br />

the numbers of limpets<br />

and the numbers of dog<br />

whelks on a sea shore?<br />

A value close to +1<br />

indicates a positive linear<br />

correlation. A value close<br />

to –1 indicates a negative<br />

linear correlation.<br />

A value close to 0<br />

indicates no correlation.<br />

Spearmanʼs<br />

rank<br />

correlation<br />

You want to know if<br />

there is a correlation<br />

(not necessarily<br />

linear) between two<br />

paired sets of data.<br />

• You have quantitative data that can<br />

be ranked.<br />

• The samples for each set of data<br />

have been made randomly.<br />

• You have at least 5 pairs of data,<br />

but preferably between 10 and 30.<br />

• A scatter graph suggests there<br />

might be a relationship between<br />

the two sets of data (not necessarily<br />

linear). Note: you cannot use this<br />

test if the scatter graph is U-shaped,<br />

i.e. the correlation is positive for<br />

some values and negative for others.<br />

Is there correlation<br />

between the surface<br />

area of a fruit and the<br />

time it takes to fall to the<br />

ground?<br />

Is there a correlation<br />

between the numbers of<br />

limpets and the numbers<br />

of dog whelks on a sea<br />

shore?<br />

Use a correlation<br />

coefficient table to look<br />

up your value of r s<br />

.<br />

If your value of r s<br />

is<br />

greater than the r s<br />

value<br />

for a probability of 0.05,<br />

you can say there is a<br />

significant correlation<br />

between your two values.<br />

Table P2.9 Summary of four statistical tests.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!