17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 4 - Planning of <strong>Prehension</strong> 101<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> 5).<br />

Since the two excitatory networks computed a wrist location, they<br />

had to agree on a location. A good location for the wrist was one<br />

where: 1) the VFs could reach the ends of the dowel, 2) the pads were<br />

aligned with each other (as a rough approximation of how precision<br />

grasping occurs), and 3) the pads were aligned with the dowel.<br />

Weights were tuned in such a way that the computed response of a<br />

node was active when an input was presented and inactive when the<br />

input died out. The input, I, to the field was a map of the solution<br />

space, indicating all the locations (r, f) that were reasonable places to<br />

put the wrist. Reasonable is used here in the sense that kinematic so-<br />

lutions exist for both VF1 and VF<strong>2.</strong> This input represents a very large<br />

solution space, because it could be defined over all possible kinematic<br />

solutions for all object sizes that could be grasped.<br />

4.6.2 Orienting the palm<br />

While the arm transports the hand to the object, the hand is ori-<br />

ented. This can be done from the shoulder joints through all the more<br />

distal joints to the grasping surfaces of the hand. With respect to wrist<br />

angle, static isometric force studies have shown that the tendons of the<br />

finger extensor muscles are too short to allow maximum grasping<br />

force when the wrist is fully flexed. For a forceful grasp, it has been<br />

noted that optimal wrist angles exist (Hazelton et al., 1975, Bunnell,<br />

1942).<br />

Constraints on orientation, such as biomechanical ones and in-<br />

tended actions, can affect grasp planning. Rosenbaum, Vaughan,<br />

Barnes, Marchak and Slotta (1990) examined the planning of complex<br />

movements in terms of awkwardness of postures. Subjects were<br />

asked to pick up a horizontal two-colored bar using either an overhand<br />

grasp (coming down on the bar, as seen in Figure 4.16a) or an under-<br />

hand grasp (coming up on the bar, as seen in Figure 4.16~). They<br />

then had to place the bar vertically either on its gray (see Figure 4.16b)<br />

or black end (Figure 4.16d) either to the left or right. All subjects<br />

used a grasp that left their wrist, elbow, and shoulder joints in a com-<br />

fortable posture at the end of the place movement. In some of these<br />

conditions, it meant the initial posture was more awkward. For ex-<br />

ample, it is initially awkward for a right-handed subject to use an un-<br />

derhand grasp to place the black side on the right side of the table.<br />

Initially it would be less awkward to use an overhand grasp for the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!