17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 8 - Constraints on Human <strong>Prehension</strong> 315<br />

relevant to prehension shows altered muscle spindle sensitivity (i.e.,<br />

dynamic changes in la afferent firing patterns) with flexion and<br />

extension of the hand (Edin, 1988). This could possibly play an<br />

important role in hand preshaping.<br />

Constraints exist on the speedtiming of sensorimotor integration.<br />

Sensory information appears to adjust ongoing movements in less<br />

time than previous estimates of visual reaction time, estimates in the<br />

range of 190-260 ms (Keele, 1968) or 120-200 ms (see Schmidt,<br />

1988). Cole and Abbs (1988) have shown responses in grip force of<br />

the index and thumb having a latency of 60-90 msec after onset of an<br />

increase or decrease in load force. The changes were dependent on the<br />

size and velocity of the perturbation force and independent of the<br />

original grip force level. The latency is longer than a monosynaptic<br />

reflex but shorter than the reaction time estimates, reflecting a rapid,<br />

automatic mechanism responding specifically to unexpected load force<br />

changes and not maintaining a preferred safety margin. They showed<br />

that this depends on cutaneous stimulation such as increased shear<br />

forces at the digital pulps due to object slips. One possible explanation<br />

is that sensory information is being used here for triggering a<br />

response, instead of as feedback for modulating a response.<br />

As well, availability of a sensory modality can affect movement.<br />

Movements occur differently depending on the availablity of the<br />

sensory information. An example is seen in a patient having a lesion<br />

in the parietal area of the cerebral cortex who could not preshape her<br />

hand while reaching to grasp an object, because she lacked<br />

somatosensory information (Jeannerod, 1986). Once the hand was<br />

within view, the patient using visual guidance could open her hand<br />

and grasp the object, although she was still unable to apply the correct<br />

grasping forces. Peripheral nerve damage can influence behavior as<br />

well (Rothwell et al., 1982). The patient in this study could initiate<br />

grasping tasks, but a stable grasp could not be maintained. He could<br />

not perform automatic reflex corrections in voluntary movements, nor<br />

could he sustain levels of muscle contraction without the use of vision.<br />

Johansson and Westling (1987) have shown that as human subjects<br />

pick up objects, microslips occur beneath the conscious awareness of<br />

the subject; that is, the object slips slightly in the grasp as the object is<br />

lifted. Recording from the median nerve, Johansson and Westling<br />

demonstrate that sensory information about the object’s state is being<br />

transmitted into the nervous system. The microslips are reduced to<br />

zero as the force level is adjusted and balanced to the frictional<br />

conditions, stabilizing the object in the grip. The Rothwell et al.<br />

patient, having lost access to microslip information, cannot make low

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!