17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 8 - Constraints on Human <strong>Prehension</strong> 311<br />

Other object properties have an effect on force generation as well.<br />

Cochran and Riley (1986) found that handle shape affects the force<br />

exerted: higher forces were seen with irregularly shaped handles<br />

(rectangular and triangular) than with uniformly shaped ones<br />

(circular). Westling and Johansson (1984) looked at precision<br />

grasping of objects with different textures and different weights. If<br />

the object's surface texture is sandpaper, then there is a higher<br />

fictional component to the interactive forces than if the surface texture<br />

is suede or silk. They looked at the ratio between the grip force (force<br />

normal to the object's surface) and the load force (force tangential to<br />

the object surface in line with gravitational force). The value for this<br />

ratio below which the object will slip out of the fingers is called the<br />

slip ratio. Johansson and Westling found evidence that subjects<br />

maintain a safety margin above this ratio, and even use one of two<br />

strategies for maintaining a safety margin: either the safety margin is a<br />

constant fraction or else a constant absolute value of the grip force.<br />

While the slip ratio is a physical constraint, maintaining such a safety<br />

margin above it is a functional constraint, imposed by some goal of the<br />

performer (in fact, for Johansson and Westling to measure the slip<br />

ratio, they had to request that their subjects 'slowly separate the thumb<br />

and index finger until the object drops', which is a difficult task to<br />

perform).<br />

How the CNS actually obtains task relevant object information is<br />

a function of the interaction with the object. Klatzky and Lederman<br />

(1990) have shown that subjects use their hands in particular ways to<br />

extract the sensory information needed in a task. For example, lateral<br />

motion is used to extract texture information and unsupported holding<br />

is used for extracting weight information. Even though a procedure is<br />

specialized for just one dimension, it is still informative along others.<br />

For example, contour following is used specifically to extract exact<br />

shape and volume, but it can also extract sensory information for all<br />

the object properties they measured. While a slower process than the<br />

more specialized ones, contour following nevertheless is a procedure<br />

typically observed in prehension. In an informal mug grasping study<br />

(Arbib, Iberall, & Lyons, 1985), the subject's fingers were seen to<br />

move along the inside of the handle while capturing the object into the<br />

grasp, thus perhaps providing to the CNS additional knowledge about<br />

the texture, hardness, temperature, and weight of the mug.<br />

In summary, prehensile behaviors are subject to the constraints<br />

imposed by the laws of physics. A dextrous, multi-fingered hand is<br />

not constrained at this level of analysis to unique prehensile postures

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!