17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

42 WHAT IS PREHENSION?<br />

quired opposing forces, virtual fingers and state variables allows for<br />

modelling and control of natural, prosthetic and robotic hands.<br />

<strong>2.</strong>5 Summary<br />

Beginning with an overview of prehension and grasp classifica-<br />

tions, the essence of these typologies has been searched. In so doing,<br />

the importance of more detailed information about prehensile postures<br />

was identified, based on the hand, object, and task characteristics.<br />

The black box introduced in <strong>Chapter</strong> 1 mapping object and task char-<br />

acteristics to prehensile behaviors can be looked at with a finer level of<br />

detail (see Figure <strong>2.</strong>10). Objects come in a variety of shapes, sizes<br />

and surface characteristics, and tasks have constraints on their spatial<br />

degrees of freedom. In order to achieve the task goals with these ob-<br />

jects, the hand is used to apply forces, impart motions as necessary,<br />

and gather sensory information. Prehensile postures can be described<br />

either using the terminology of the classifications listed in Table <strong>2.</strong>1,<br />

or else in opposition space terms. Schlesinger identified hand surfaces<br />

and shapes that combine with object characteristics to name possible<br />

ways that the hand, in effect, creates tools for prehension. He pointed<br />

out how the hand can grasp arbitrary objects. Napier introduced the<br />

notion of task features, noting that the power and precision<br />

requirements of tasks could be met by the power and precision<br />

capabilities of the human hand. Landsmeer focused on the dynamic<br />

aspects of grasping and contrasted precision handling with power<br />

grasp, noting the manipulative options are afforded by opposing the<br />

pads of the thumb and fingers. Kapandji gave examples, such as<br />

turning, squeezing, and cutting, and Elliott and Connolly provided a<br />

vocabulary to expand on this notion (twiddling, rocking, rolling,<br />

stepping, sliding). Other researchers, studying the hand from<br />

anatomical, occupational, disability, and robotics perspectives, have<br />

identified unique sensorimotor features of the hand that are exhibited<br />

in the link grip, the hook grip, the three-jaw chuck, the dynamic tri-<br />

pod, the adduction grasp, and the finger-as-antenna. The Opposition<br />

Space model suggests that, in all these postures, the hand is applying<br />

oppositional forces against task forces and torques and/or around an<br />

object along three general directions, either alone or in combinations.<br />

This extensive multidisciplinary research provides insights into the<br />

functionality of the human hand, based on three issues: applying<br />

forces to match the anticipated forces in the task, imparting motion to<br />

the object as necessary, and gathering sensory information about the<br />

state of the interaction with the object.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!