17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

310 CONSTRAINTS AND PHASES<br />

While their existence is more an aspect of the hand’s anatomy (see<br />

Section 6.1), their use in a prehensile posture is such that they can<br />

automatically supply a force sufficient to counteract small amplitude<br />

perturbations of the object, useful in stable grasping (along the lines<br />

of a ‘soft finger’ as a contact type that resists moments about the<br />

contact normal (Salisbury & Craig, 1982). The lubricant is greasy,<br />

having good adhesive qualities at low shear velocities, enhanced by<br />

the hills and valleys of the ridged surface extending the total shearing<br />

surface area (Moore, 1975). At high shear velocities, friction is<br />

reduced, thus minimizing wear and tear of the hand surface. Because<br />

ridges are concentric in orientation, there will always be some<br />

perpendicular to the force exerted (as opposed to in the palm where<br />

this is not true). However, due to biomechanical properties, skin<br />

responds in nonlinear ways to loads (Wilkes, Brown, & Wildnauer,<br />

1973). As the load increases, collagen fibers in the dermis reorient<br />

from an irregularly arranged pattern to one orientated in the direction<br />

of the applied load. As more fibers become aligned and thus resist<br />

extension along their length, the skin becomes stiffer, reducing its<br />

ability to comply with the object.<br />

Object properties and the object’s relationship to the environment<br />

can affect the chosen posture. Jeannerod (1981) made a distinction<br />

between intrinsic and extrinsic properties of objects. Extrinsic<br />

properties are those spatially related to the person (i.e., location,<br />

distance, angle, etc.) and would include support constraints, such as a<br />

table supporting a surface, and other obstacle constraints (forcing one<br />

to reach around another object). Lederman and Klatzky (1987) have<br />

shown how subjects can extract intrinsic object properties relevant to<br />

the task. These include surface properties (texture, hardness, and<br />

temperature), structural properties (shape, volume, weight), and<br />

functional properties (part motion, specific function). Before making<br />

contact with an object, people can perceive many object properties<br />

visually (see Klatzky & Lederman, 1990). In a study where subjects<br />

had to use a precision grip to grasp one of ten different sized wooden<br />

disks, Marteniuk, Leavitt, MacKenzie, and Athenes (1990) showed<br />

that the maximum aperture reached during preshaping between the<br />

index finger and thumb closely correlated with disk size. In terms of<br />

the constraints that object properties impose on prehension, examples<br />

are numerous: object shape can delimit grasp postures and the number<br />

of fingers potentially contacting a surface; the weight of the object can<br />

determine the type and strength of grip; and the availability of an object<br />

surface will constrain the orientation of the reach and potential contact<br />

locations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!