17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix C - Computational Neural Modelling 389<br />

input directly from every other unit, hence the number of connections<br />

is equal to the square of the number of units. As before, some units<br />

are defined as input units, while others are defined as output units.<br />

Recurrent networks are capable of more complex behavior, in<br />

particular rather than converging on a single state, they may settle into<br />

limit cycles of neural activity. Such networks are in general harder to<br />

analyze, but are necessary when dynamic behavior is desired.<br />

C.<strong>2.</strong>2 Adaptation in neural networks<br />

Computational models can be adaptable or non-adaptable. Non-<br />

adaptive networks have fixed synaptic weights and behavior, whereas<br />

adaptive networks modify their synaptic weights (and therefore their<br />

behavior) over time according to the stimuli they experience. Hybrid<br />

nets also exist which have ‘pre-wired’ non-adaptive portions<br />

interacting with adaptive portions, as was seen in the Kuperstein<br />

(1988) model in <strong>Chapter</strong> 43. A non-adaptive network might model a<br />

peripheral area which does not change its behavior over time, such as<br />

the spinal circuitry subserving the knee-jerk reflex. Adaptive neural<br />

nets would be used to model parts of the brain concerned with<br />

learning, which change their behavior with experience.<br />

In an adaptive neural network, the synaptic connection weights<br />

modify themselves based on locally available information, that is the<br />

‘activity levels’ in the pre- and post-synaptic neurons. This is one of<br />

the compelling properties of neural networks - that while the individual<br />

units are performing simple computations on the small scale, the<br />

overall network may develop complex emergent behavior. There are<br />

two classes of adaptation rules - supervised and unsupervised.<br />

Supervised adaptation rules contain some measure of the desired<br />

behavior of the network, while unsupervised adaptation rules do not.<br />

(Thus networks governed by supervised learning develop behavior<br />

defined by the training signal, whereas those governed by<br />

unsupervised learning respond to properties of the patterns presented,<br />

extracting repeated information or correlations in the data.)<br />

In neural network models, this adaptation is captured in a learning<br />

&. In 1949, D. 0. Hebb described a rule which has been<br />

generalized to the following: adjust the strength of the connections<br />

3An adaptive network can also be used as if it were non-adaptive. For example,<br />

once the Model Network in the Jordan (1988) network learned the inverse<br />

kinematics of the arm, it was used as a fixed network while the Sequential Network<br />

learned the sequences.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!