17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Small, sharp borders<br />

Large, obscure borders<br />

ADAPTATION<br />

Fast,<br />

no static response<br />

l-----L<br />

--HHc----c<br />

Edge sensitivity<br />

(43%)<br />

FA1 Meissner<br />

FA11 p(aliz)a<br />

Golgi-Mazzoni<br />

Slow,<br />

#latic response preseni<br />

J-----L *<br />

-<br />

Irregular<br />

Edge sensitivity<br />

(25%)<br />

SAI Merkel<br />

_/--7_<br />

Regular<br />

Sensitive to<br />

lateral skin stretct<br />

(1 9%)<br />

SAII Ruffini<br />

Figure 6.7. Types of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand<br />

and some of their distinguishing characteristics. The graphs in the middle schematically show<br />

the impulse discharge (lower traces) to perpendicular ramp indentations of the skin (upper<br />

traces) for each unit type. The black patches and the dashed areas of the left drawings of the<br />

hand show the extent of typical receptive fields for type I and type I1 units, respectively. Each<br />

dot in the drawings represents a single sensory unit. In addition, the relative frequency of<br />

occurrence and the probable morphological correlate are indicated for each unit type<br />

respectively. It should be noted that the terminology of the tactile afferent units in the<br />

present account follows Johansson and Vallbo (1983) (from Johansson & Westling, 1990;<br />

adapted by permission).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!