17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

230 THE PHASES OF PREHENSION<br />

(see <strong>Chapter</strong> 8 on Constraints).<br />

6.<strong>2.</strong>2 Holding and jiggling: discriminating weight<br />

To appreciate and discriminate the weight of an object, some have<br />

held the view that humans depend on centrally generated commands<br />

(efference copy or sense of effort) more than peripheral afferent<br />

information (e.g., Gandevia & McCloskey, 1977a,b,c). Others have<br />

suggested that the sensory afferents from muscles and tendons are<br />

critical (e.g., Roland & Ladegaard-Pedersen, 1977). Victor Raj, Ingty<br />

and Devanandan (1985) examined healthy individuals and leprous<br />

patients with chronic anesthesia of the hands, in their ability to<br />

discriminate weights with passive skin compression, compared to<br />

active flexion about the elbow or metacarpophalangeal joint. They<br />

found that active movements of the digits were required for forces<br />

smaller than 100 g to be appreciated. Although afferent information<br />

was sufficient to discriminate weights greater than 100 g, active<br />

movements of the digits signicantly increased the sensitivity of the<br />

discrimination. Elbow movements were much like cutaneous<br />

stimulation alone. Based on the assessment of leprous hands, and<br />

comparisons with healthy hands, they suggest that in humans the<br />

afferents from the extrinsic hand muscles cannot adequately sense the<br />

smaller forces (less than 100 g), and such force appreciation must be<br />

dependent on the intrinsic hand muscles, and digital joints as well as<br />

cutaneous afferents.<br />

Compared to holding, 'jiggling' an object has been shown to<br />

improve performance on a forced-c hoice weight discrimination task<br />

(Brodie & Ross, 1985). Grasping with pad opposition, they had<br />

subjects lift cylinders to a marked height of 20 cm (described as using<br />

the shoulder as a fulcrum for the lift), then holding or "jiggling", then<br />

lowering the object. Jiggling consisted of repeated vertical movements<br />

for 3 sec. They used cylinders (4.5 x <strong>2.</strong>5 cm) weighing 52 to 64 g, in<br />

2 g. intervals. They considered a number of options explaining the<br />

advantage of jiggling over holding, including that jiggling provides<br />

inertial cues to mass beyond the forces required to overcome gravity,<br />

and that receptors may be functioning optimally, through a complex<br />

interaction betwen efferent and afferent signals.<br />

For the complexity of weight appreciation, Marsden, Rothwell,<br />

and Traub (1979) emphasized the need to seek more experimental<br />

evidence in order to evaluate the importance of different sources of<br />

information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!