17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 9 - Reevaluation and Future Directions 337<br />

do, as shown in <strong>Chapter</strong> 6. The natural frequency for manipulative<br />

movements, in humans, has been observed to be in the 4-7 Hz range<br />

(Kunesch, Binkofski & Freund, 1989).<br />

9.1.4 Mapping between inputs and outputs<br />

The act of grasping an object involves the planning, setting up,<br />

using, and releasing of an opposition space for the task, as outlined in<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong>s 3 through 7.<br />

During the planning phase, task-related object properties are<br />

perceived, as noted above. This entails seeing an opposition vector in<br />

the object that will satisfy the required degrees of freedom of the task.<br />

It depends on previous knowledge about the behavior of objects, and<br />

our ability to predict and anticipate task-specific prehensile<br />

occurrences. A grasp strategy is chosen, selecting appropriate<br />

opposition types, mapping virtual fingers into real anatomical fingers,<br />

and determining opposition space parameters. The choice of the<br />

opposition vector must satisfy the constraints imposed by the object,<br />

task, and hand. Computational models have demonstrated possible<br />

ways to map object and task characteristics to hand postures, using<br />

expert systems (Cutkosky & Howe, 1990; Iberall et al., 1988;<br />

Stansfield, 1991) and neural networks (Iberall, 1988; Uno et al.,<br />

1993). Finally, a location and orientation in space for the hand to go<br />

to must be planned. Planning a hand location and orientation will<br />

depend on the grasp strategy chosen. Such a decision can be based on<br />

retinal information (Klatzky et al., 1987, Sivak & Mackenzie, 1992)<br />

or on knowledge about the hand. As was shown in <strong>Chapter</strong>s 4 and 5,<br />

cortical parietal areas, premotor and motor areas, and spinal areas are<br />

all processing information relevant to arm reaching and grasping<br />

(Alstermark, Gorska, Lundberg, & Pettersson, 1990; Georgopoulos<br />

1990). For example, Georgopoulos (1990) shows evidence of motor<br />

cortex and area 5 computing a Populational Vector that specifies the<br />

direction of arm movement prior to movement.<br />

Setting up the opposition space involves preshaping the hand and<br />

transporting it towards the object. At first, the hand moves in an<br />

unrestrained way opening to a posture suitable for the task (Jeannerod,<br />

1984) and to stretch the finger flexors (Smith et al., 1983). The<br />

relationship between the transport and grasping components appears to<br />

be functionally specific to the high level goal of the task (Jeannerod,<br />

1984; Marteniuk et al., 1987; Wing, Turton, & Fraser, 1986).<br />

Noting the interwoven action of wrist, forearm, elbow, and shoulder<br />

muscles, we suggest that the palm is the likely interface between the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!