17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix D - Prosthetic and Robotic Hands 405<br />

greater servicing is required. Most important however is the lack of<br />

sensory feedback, other than auditory and visual clues, requiring a<br />

high level of concentration. Proportional myoelectric control have<br />

additional advantages over digial myoelectric control, and these<br />

include better control of force and speed, and less muscular effort<br />

expended. A disadvantage of proportional myoelectric control is that<br />

currently the circuits are larger. However, it operates on a very low<br />

threshold EMG signal, and therefore operates with less muscle effort<br />

and continues to run until the muscles are completely relaxed.<br />

Stein and Walley (1983) found that tasks with a myoelectric<br />

prosthesis took twice as long as a hook and five times as long as with<br />

a normal hand. Yet 60% of below-elbow amputees preferred to use the<br />

myoelectric prosthesis compared to a conventional prosthesis. Yet,<br />

although the subjects were able to accomplish the tasks faster with the<br />

hook vs the hand, extreme body movements had to be used due to the<br />

harnessing, such as rotating the trunk in order to rotate a heavy object.<br />

With the myoelectric prosthesis users, this was not observed.<br />

However, in a survey of 33 patients on proportional versus digital<br />

control, Sears and S haperman ( 199 1) found the proportional<br />

myoelectric hand to be quicker than a hook and digital myoelectric<br />

hand, with the amount of effort reduced. Patients rated it low for its<br />

weight and bulkiness, but felt that it appeared more natural during use.<br />

Former digital hand wearers gave the proportional myoelectric hand<br />

the highest performance ratings, but the lowest rating on convenience.<br />

Since the user can control speed and force, it was felt that there was<br />

better control over fastenings in dressing, better dexterity in using<br />

pencil, better control in using tools, and noticed difference in ability to<br />

hold fragile objects.<br />

Two other external control mechanisms have been used. One is<br />

servo-control, where the hand opening is proportional to a<br />

transducer’s motion. The transducer is controlled mechanically, with<br />

very little froce and excursion. The other is switch control. It is similar<br />

to servo-control, in that some minimal force and excursion capability<br />

is required from a remaining body part. For example, a shoulder<br />

flexion of 1.3 cm excursion can be used to activate the switch (Peizer,<br />

198 1).<br />

D.<strong>2.</strong>2 Split hook<br />

As a prosthetic device, the split hook is strong, lightweight,<br />

simple, functional and reliable (Law, 1981). It has functional shapes<br />

(narrow tips, flat gripping surfaces, specialized tool-holding grips),

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!