17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix D - Prosthetic and Robotic Hands 403<br />

certain restrictions apply, particularly at the physical level in terms of<br />

dynamics and kinematics, even though they are different realizations<br />

(see <strong>Chapter</strong> 8). While a robot controller will not necessarily use the<br />

same algorithms that the central nervous system does (since we don't<br />

know those!), behaviors can be modelled and tested on a mechanical<br />

hand, with success or failure being seen immediately. High level<br />

control variables, such as opposition space parameters, could be used<br />

to drive the artificial device. Such an abstraction at the functional level<br />

is typical of the general progression toward machine-independence<br />

seen in computer systems, and would allow a variety of hand designs<br />

to be developed for different purposes but still be able to share a<br />

common control language.<br />

D.2 Prostheses and Their Control<br />

Objectives for the design of future prosthetic devices (Childress,<br />

1974) include subconscious control, comfort, cosmetics, reliability,<br />

esthetics, and improvement over existing prosthetic devices. The<br />

control system should be (Jacobsen et al., 1982) reasonable to learn,<br />

natural, graceful, reliable, flexible, and include feedback. In terms of<br />

the fingers themselves (Law 198l), they should be light, robust, have<br />

consistent joint frictional forces, be compatible with socket and palmar<br />

materials, and provide an accurate fill for the cosmetic covering,<br />

maintaining a good cosmetic profile throughout the full range of<br />

movement. The needs of the amputee have been divided into two basic<br />

requirements: the desire for the best aesthetic replacement, and the<br />

restoration of specific hand functions (Baumgartner, 198 1, Peizer,<br />

1981). Currently, no one prosthetic device can accomplish all of<br />

these. The devices available include body-powered split hook or hand,<br />

electrically powered hand controlled by myoelectrically, and cosmetic<br />

passive hand. Studies have shown that amputees have a variety of<br />

functional needs (c.f., Millstein et al., 1986), and thus they may have<br />

one or more devices. In fact, Therapeutic Recreation Systems<br />

(Boulder, Colorado) has introduced a family of designs called the<br />

Super Sport series, shaped specifically just for catching a ball.<br />

D.<strong>2.</strong>1 Control of prosthetic devices<br />

Body powered prostheses use power transmitted in the most direct<br />

way for maximum indirect sensory feedback. Four different body<br />

sources are used (Baumgartner, 1981): the wrist joint, the forearm,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!