17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

264 THE PHASES OF PREHENSION<br />

with ulnar deviation, neutral between extension and flexion, whereas<br />

in a precision grasp, the wrist is dorsiflexed, positioned between ulnar<br />

and radial deviation. Because the extrinsic muscles send tendons<br />

through the wrist, the amount of force that the fingers are able to apply<br />

is greater in wrist extension and/or ulnar deviation than in other<br />

positions. In addition, there are differences between the fingers in<br />

their potential contribution to force application. For a hook grip,<br />

Hazelton et al. (1975) noted that the relative amount of force available<br />

at each finger remains constant across wrist positions (25% at the<br />

index, 33.5% at the long finger, 25% at the ring finger, and 16.5% at<br />

the little finger). For the power grasp, Amis (1987) found the mean<br />

contributions to the overall grasp force to be 30%, 30%, 22%, and<br />

18% for the index, long, ring and little fingers, respectively.<br />

The human hand can impart arbitrary forces and torques using<br />

pad opposition in the tripod (Drucker & Hollerbach, 1987). Subjects<br />

grasped a medium sized sphere using the thumb, index and middle<br />

fingers. The sphere was instrumented with a sensor capable of<br />

measuring forces and torques along six axes. Receiving constant<br />

feedback about actual forces being applied, subjects were asked to<br />

manipulate the sphere in arbitrary directions in order to achieve a<br />

target. Results indicated that subjects could control all force and<br />

torque components separately.<br />

6.5.2 Analytic posture measures<br />

The analysis of a grasp in the field of robotics uses formal quality<br />

measures. A formal quality measure is a quantification of some aspect<br />

of a grasp posture. Cutkosky and Howe (1990) informally described<br />

these measures as follows:<br />

Compliance: what is the effective compliance (the inverse of<br />

stiffness) of the grasped object with respect to the hand?<br />

Connectivity: how many degrees of freedom are there between the<br />

grasped object and the hand?<br />

Force closure: assuming that external forces act to maintain contact<br />

between the fingers and object, is the object unable to move<br />

without slipping when the fingers are ‘locked’?<br />

Form closure: can external forces and moments be applied from<br />

any direction without moving the object when the fingers are<br />

locked?<br />

Grasp isotropy: does the grasp configuration permit the finger<br />

joints to accurately apply forces and moments to the object?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!