17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

252 THE PHASES OF PREHENSION<br />

respectively). Thus, the ratio of grip-force/load-force can be lower for<br />

sandpaper than silk for a given weight. The ratio of grip-forceboad-<br />

force always exceeds a slip ratio by some safety margin. The slip ratio<br />

is that ratio of grip-forceboad-force at which the object slips from<br />

grasp as subjects open their fingers, shown in Figure 6.17b. The grip<br />

and load forces and their ratios are shown for the entire duration of the<br />

task in Figure 6.18.<br />

6.4.2 Phases in applying grip and load forces<br />

Westling and Johansson identified a series of distinct phases for<br />

the task of lifting the object from a table, holding it in the air, then<br />

replacing it on the table. From Figure 6.18, they identified the<br />

following events. A preload phase (about 80-100 ms) as the subject<br />

first grips the object (a) during which the grip force increases but the<br />

load force does not. This is followed by a- (b) when the<br />

grip and load forces increase in parallel. When the load force<br />

overcomes the force due to gravity (equal to the weight of the object),<br />

the object starts to move, beginning a transitional phase (c). When the<br />

object is being held in the air, the position of the object and grip and<br />

load forces are nearly constant, comprising a static phase (d). The<br />

replacement phase (e) includes motion of the object back to the table.<br />

After a short delay phase (0, the (g) occurs as the<br />

grip and load forces decrease in parallel. Then, the object is released.<br />

Using a similarly instrumented dowel, many of the Johansson<br />

and Westling results have been replicated in experiments examining<br />

object weight and task requirements (Weir, 1991; Weir & MacKenzie,<br />

1993, in preparation). We did not find a separate preloading phase; at<br />

first contact with the object, our strain gauge transducers register both<br />

grip and load forces. This may be reflecting minor differences in the<br />

object instrumentation or experimental setup. The Weir & MacKenzie<br />

experiments used a strain gauge transducer design similar to that in<br />

Figure 6.16. Our dowels were weighted with buckshot inserts below<br />

the transducing mechanism, whereas Westling and Johansson had<br />

their weights suspended from the instrumented object, below the table<br />

surface. Initially in the loading phase, the load forces were sometimes<br />

negative, indicating that subjects were ‘pushing’ the dowel into the<br />

table surface prior to liftoff, as shown in Figure 6.19. This increased<br />

with object weight such that heavier objects were pushed harder into<br />

the table as forces were first applied, prior to the parallel increase in<br />

grip and load forces. During the loading phase, for heavier compared<br />

to lighter objects, forces were applied for a longer duration, and at a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!