17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 6 - During Contact 249<br />

the grip force, with a constant ratio of grip-forceboad-force for a given<br />

surface texture. With heavier objects, lifting forces were applied for a<br />

longer duration, and at a higher rate. In contrast, manipulations of<br />

surface texture affected only the grip force, not the load force, thus<br />

different ratios of grip-force/load-force were obtained for a given<br />

weight (Johansson & Westling, 1984a, 1990; Westling, 1986).<br />

Thus, the surface texture manipulations affecting the frictional<br />

conditions in relation to the skin created a need for subjects to grip<br />

more forcefully a more slippery object, in order to achieve the same<br />

load force. These effects are shown in Figure 6.17.<br />

Westling and Johansson (1984) showed how:<br />

“the static grip force is adapted to the friction between skin and<br />

object as well as to the weight of the object so that the employed<br />

grip force is greater by a relatively small safety margin than the<br />

minimal force required to prevent slip. The adaptation to the<br />

frictional condition appears to be dependent on signals in<br />

afferents terminating in the fingers, most likely tactile afferents,<br />

since it was impaired during blockage of the afferent signals in<br />

the digital nerves.”<br />

The coefficient of static friction with respect to the skin of sandpaper is<br />

higher than of silk (mean values reported by Johansson & Westling,<br />

1984b, are 1.21, 0.68 and 0.35 for sandpaper, suede and silk<br />

standing on the table. To reliably define the point in time when<br />

the object took off from the table and when it made contact again,<br />

the contact with the table was electrically detected. B. and C.<br />

Illustration of the arrangement of the strain gauges and levers<br />

constituting the force transducers. Three groups of four strain<br />

gauges (with length = L) were glued to both sides of three levers<br />

(nonfilled in fig.). Each group constituted a full electric bridge<br />

measuring the load force and the two grip forces, respectively. B.<br />

The object with unloaded transducers rests on the table. C. Loaded<br />

transducers while the object is lifted. The initial length of the<br />

strain gauges are labelled L, and the lengths after loading L + Ln;<br />

and L - Ln (n=l, 2 and 3 for the three transducers respectively).<br />

Two of the strain gauges in each group were lengthened whereas<br />

two were shortened. Because the load force bridge was balanced<br />

when the object freely rested on the table, all load forces at the<br />

touched surfaces were reliably measured (from Westling, 1986;<br />

reprinted by permission from Johansson & Westling, 1990).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!