17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

322 CONSTRAINTS AND PHASES<br />

component to a prehensile posture, if so needed in a task. The<br />

tradeoff for this extra power is in not having the finger pulps in contact<br />

with the object; a compromise would be to use a combination of side<br />

and palm opposition, where the thumb pad contacts the object and<br />

applies a force transverse to the palm. If the task goal is to 'move as<br />

quickly and as accurately as possible', timing parameters are chosen<br />

consistent with Fitts' Law while also consistent with kinematic and<br />

dynamic constraints acting on the hand and arm. Not only must the<br />

anticipated forces be matched, an opposition space must be chosen that<br />

allows perceptual systems access to the information needed to ensure<br />

the accuracy requirements. Accuracy suggests pad opposition, but<br />

only if the forces are not too great. With greater forces, one<br />

compromise is to use more fingers in the VF opposing the thumb.<br />

The final mapping to be discussed from the Opposition Space level<br />

(Figure 8.1) is the Sensorimotor level. Opposition space parameters<br />

are re-represented at this level in terms of the activation level of the<br />

muscles and receptors acting on the fingers, which, in effect, is the<br />

implementation level. Anatomical constraints, for example, limit the<br />

number of ways real fingers can be mapped into VFs. The task goal of<br />

'not dropping the object', expanded by the ways that forces can be<br />

generated to achieve the goal, is further translated into a posture that<br />

judicially uses the skin mechanoreceptors, optimally placing the pulps,<br />

with all their receptors, against the object. The chosen VFs must have<br />

adequate sensory resolution and sensitivity at the contact points. With<br />

large task forces, pad opposition would not be effective due to loss of<br />

skin sensitivity and lack of muscle strength. Being able to anticipate<br />

much of the object's behavior upon contact allows part of the choice to<br />

be influenced by the VF parameters that will correctly position task-<br />

specific sensors for triggering the next action. If the object starts<br />

moving, the tonic vibration reflex will force the fingers to close<br />

tighter. Perhaps in contour following, where the fingers are moving<br />

instead of the object, similar principles apply. The advantage of<br />

performing contour following is that one gains additional knowledge<br />

about the object's various properties, and the fingers can perhaps be<br />

better placed for effecting a stable grasp. If palm opposition is used in<br />

order to handle the larger forces, the posture still gives information<br />

about the object state, particularly because the palm can adapt to the<br />

object's shape and therefore place more skin surface in contact with<br />

the object. In terms of constraints on the mapping from virtual to real<br />

fingers, there are significant distinctions in how the individual fingers<br />

contribute to prehension (number of muscles, types of articular<br />

surfaces, lengths and widths of phalanges, type of support at wrist,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!