17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

308 CONSTRAINTS AND PHASES<br />

the index finger makes contact before the thumb, the glass will rotate<br />

out of the grasp if the direction of the line of pushing (a line parallel to<br />

the motion of the finger, drawn through the contact point) is to the<br />

near side of the center of mass between the glass and the table. If,<br />

instead, the line of pushing is through the center of mass or to the far<br />

side, the glass will translate towards or rotate into the thumb,<br />

respectively.<br />

Hand postures afford different ways to apply forces. Biomaterials<br />

such as bones, muscles, tendons, ligaments, and skin create<br />

limitations on static and dynamic force generation. Chao, Opgrande<br />

and Axmear (1976) argued that typically used postures are ones where<br />

joints are stabilized and where forces can be applied optimally without<br />

undue stress and strain on the ligaments, joint capsules, tendons, and<br />

muscles. An example would be locations where articular surfaces<br />

coadapt, thus permitting increased force generation while decreasing<br />

stress on ligaments and muscles. Results from cadaver studies have<br />

been used to develop and verify computer models of the mechanisms<br />

used by muscles and tendons to generate force across the various<br />

joints for different isometric hand postures (An et al., 1985; Chao et<br />

al., 1976; Cooney & Chao, 1977; Wells, Ranney & Keeler, 1985).<br />

Extrinsic finger flexors (as seen in Appendix A, forearm muscles that<br />

insert into the phalanges by sending long tendons through the wrist<br />

and hand) have a greater mechanical advantage than the extrinsic<br />

extensors (Tubiana, 1981). Within the hand, the intrinsic muscles of<br />

the index finger produce more force in a lateral pinch than in an<br />

enclosing grasp (An et al., 1985). The fingers and thumb have an<br />

average greater strength in a power grasp than in a pulp pinch (An et<br />

al., 1985; Cooney & Chao, 1977), particularly because multiple points<br />

of contact apply a force against the object. However, the size of the<br />

finger separation in the power grasp influences the gripping forces. In<br />

a task involving the isometric grasp of different size cylinders, Amis<br />

(1987) determined that the distal phalanx exerts the largest gripping<br />

(normal) force in all fingers, with a smaller force produced by the<br />

middle and proximal phalanges. Summing up these forces within a<br />

finger, the total normal force was largest for the smallest objects, and<br />

then decreased as the object size increased. Shearing forces at the<br />

distal and proximal phalanges for the index, middle, and ring fingers<br />

tended to pull the object into the grasp for smaller objects. As the<br />

object got larger, shearing forces on the middle and proximal<br />

phalanges tended to zero out, while at the distal phalanges, they tended<br />

to push the object out of the grasp. Other studies have analyzed the<br />

effect of wrist position on available force in precision and power

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!