17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

274 THE PHASES OF PREHENSION<br />

shape of each ellipsoid reflecting the relative force requirement or<br />

motion requirement of the task. A grasp is stable if for every object<br />

wrench, there is a choice of joint torques to balance it, and a grasp is<br />

manipulable if, for every object motion, there exists a choice of joint<br />

velocities that will accommodate that motion without breaking contact.<br />

A grasp is assigned a twist space quality measure, which is the ratio<br />

between the task ellipsoid and the finger joint velocities, and a wrench<br />

space quality measure, which is the ratio between the task ellipsoid<br />

and the joint torques. A grasp is ‘good’, with respect to a given task,<br />

if it has a higher quality measure than other grasps (e.g., precision<br />

tasks need grasps with a high quality measure in the twist space).<br />

Finding a good grasp, then, is solved as an optimization problem.<br />

Once the grasp is found then given a goal, such as moving an object<br />

along a specified trajectory, Li and Sastry formulate a control<br />

algorithm for realizing the trajectory without breaking contact while<br />

regulating the internal forces.<br />

Fearing (1990) discussed how Kobayashi (1985) used a force<br />

control system to control local object motions with fingers in constant<br />

grasping locations. When objects need to be regrasped, for example<br />

in twirling a baton, roboticists have accomplished this through<br />

preprogrammed finger position commands (Okada, 1982) or using a<br />

sequence of applied forces at each finger (Fearing, 1986). To ensure<br />

robust manipulation, tactile sensing and perception are needed to<br />

provide information on contact forces and local shape properties.<br />

Tactile sensors can provide local shape information, including contact<br />

location on the finger, surface normals, principal curvatures and their<br />

direction. From this information, global object properties such as<br />

size, location and orientation are inferred. Fearing (1990, p. 236)<br />

notes that “the reorientation sub-system would command finger force,<br />

stiffness and position. High speed tactile or force sensing can monitor<br />

the grasping operation for unexpected forces, contact slip, and loss of<br />

contact. The reorientation planner may also continuously monitor<br />

object position during reorientation, and develop error recovery<br />

strategies if unexpected object loads are encountered”. He notes that<br />

there are complicated compliance, friction, rolling and slipping effects<br />

that can occur at finger-object interfaces.<br />

Rather than relying on sensors, Mason (1985) discussed how<br />

humans take advantage of task mechanics. In effect, control places us<br />

in the ballpark of the desired locations, forces, torques, motions; then,<br />

we use the intrinsic mechanics of the task environment as a funnel to<br />

eliminate uncertainties about the locations and shapes of objects (like<br />

funneling sand, where the funnel reduces uncertainty in the location of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!