17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

268 THE PHASES OF PREHENSION<br />

system has a different set of mechanical and functional properties.<br />

Once grasped, the object is lifted, and it may be held (as in lifting a<br />

mug to wipe a countertop), transported (to place the mug on a shelf),<br />

manipulated (to hand to someone, to drink from, or to explore its<br />

features) and replaced (on the countertop).<br />

In considering manipulative hand movements, a profound<br />

distinction was made by Kunesch, Binkofski and Freund (1989).<br />

They analyzed the temporal frequency characteristics of manipulative,<br />

serial hand movements, for tasks including tactile discrimination,<br />

pencil shading, handwriting, typewriting, and repetititive tapping.<br />

They report a bimodal result: two separate classes of natural preferred<br />

frequencies (see Figure 6.21). At 1.56 Hz cluster exploratory finger<br />

movements in which the hand is used in active touch, to determine<br />

object properties like shape and texture. They suggest the slower<br />

range reflects ‘focal sensory control’, i.e., the temporal requirements<br />

of the sequential sampling from the mechanoreceptor population.<br />

These movements use motion to collect detailed somatosensory<br />

information. At 4 - 7 Hz cluster handwriting, and other cyclic, learned<br />

hand movements, with frequencies close to those of fast tapping.<br />

Frequencies for handwriting and shading were almost the same,<br />

regardless of whether the fingertip or pencil was used. They<br />

suggested the higher frequency movements are under different sensory<br />

control: the high frequency movements are not performed entirely<br />

open-loop, but monitored by ‘preattentive sensory processes’. These<br />

movements use proprioceptive and somatosensory inputs to monitor<br />

motion. This distinction between the two types of movements,<br />

consistent with Gibson’s (1962) ‘exploratory’ and ‘performatory’<br />

hand movements, is important for several reasons. First, the role of<br />

sensory information in motor control is different in the two classes of<br />

movements. Second, the task requirements for manipulation are key<br />

inputs for control, and manipulation to extract object properties using<br />

active touch is fundamentally different from manipulation in using<br />

touch for action with objects.<br />

It is important to distinguish between a static grasp for holding<br />

and transporting an object and a dynamic grasp for manipulation. In<br />

the first instance, an object is held firmly in a stable grasp with<br />

constant contacts, and object motion is achieved via the wrist, elbow,<br />

shoulder, or even through locomotion. In contrast, coordinated<br />

movements of the digits can manipulate an object within the hand.<br />

With respect to humans transporting a grasped object, it was<br />

observed in <strong>Chapter</strong> 5 that the kinematics of pointing with a loaded<br />

limb (Atkeson and Hollerbach, 1985) are scaled from the trajectory of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!