17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

292 THE PHASES OF PREHENSION<br />

Fitts’ Law, one of the few lawful relationships in motor control,<br />

demonstrates a speed-accurarcy tradeoff in many movements.<br />

Asymmetric velocity profiles point to the possibility of a two-phase<br />

controller for complex movements where interaction with the<br />

environment is required. The environmentally-defined goal seems to<br />

suggest that a precision effect might be in play in these situations.<br />

This precision effect shows up in the second part of the movement<br />

where sensory information is needed for changing from an<br />

unrestrained movement to a guarded movement. As seen in Figure<br />

7.4, preshaping the fingers and orienting the palm are concurrent<br />

activities, to get the hand configuration ‘in the ballpark’ of the object<br />

during the first phase.<br />

During the preshape, from movement onset to peak aperture, the<br />

hand moves in an unrestrained way. The preshaping of the hand into<br />

a suitable posture for the task is an inherently unique event. It sets up<br />

the opposition space, with the posture chosen reflecting perceived<br />

object properties, such as size and shape, and also task properties. The<br />

force production muscles are stretched, preparing to be used. In order<br />

to accomplish this setting up, sensory information is needed --<br />

proprioceptive usually, but if it is not available through some sort of<br />

neural dysfunction, then vision can be used. In situations where<br />

sensory information is reduced (e.g., blind conditions, fast<br />

movements), the hand opens wider. If planning is occurring in terms<br />

of sensory consequences, then during preshaping, there would be no<br />

anticipated tactile feedback. Accidental contact with the object is<br />

avoided. In terms of a controller, if the free motion is ballistic, then<br />

contact is of course ignored.<br />

As the fingers are enclosing, a transition is occurring between the<br />

previously unrestrained movements of preshaping and the upcoming<br />

compliant motions to be made during contact with the object. During<br />

this transition phase, the hand is performing a guarded motion, trying<br />

to establish tactile contact. Sensory information is sought by the Drive<br />

Fingers Guarded Schema, comparing the anticipated tactile feedback to<br />

the current haptic information. The chosen pads (for pad opposition,<br />

or more generally, grasping surface patches for all oppositions) are<br />

being brought into a specific contact with the object. Research has<br />

shown that the CNS knows the direction that the pads are pointing.<br />

The arm is subservient to the hand, helping in the guarded move to<br />

establish contact. The force-generating muscles are active to ‘drive the<br />

fingers’ around the object. Central vision can compare the location of<br />

some part of the hand with the object, since both are within a small<br />

visual field. The controller can use the cone of friction as a ballpark to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!