17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

404 Appendices<br />

biceps, and shoulder and thoracic muscles. Using the shoulder and<br />

thoracic muscles, force is transmitted by a shoulder harness and cable<br />

to the terminal device. Body-powered devices are relatively<br />

inexpensive, functional, reliable, and have some indirect sensory<br />

proprioceptive feedback (Muilenburg & LeBlanc, 1989). They are<br />

functionally better than other methods, because position and force<br />

feedback is available from the harness. The indirect sensory feedback<br />

is provided through extended physiological proprioception (Law,<br />

198 l), which comes from proprioceptive information about limb<br />

position and velocity. This seems to extend to include additional limb<br />

segments provided a consistent relationship exists between the<br />

position and velocity of the artifical segment and the position, velocity,<br />

and applied force of the contiguous natural body part (Law, 1981).<br />

Externally powered, myoelectric prostheses are controlled by<br />

electromyographic (EMG) signals, where the force developed by the<br />

muscle is used to drive motors or to set control switches.<br />

Conventional myoelectric hands have a single channel from a pair of<br />

opposing muscle groups, controlling a single degree of freedom in the<br />

hand (Kyberd et al., 1987). The input is usually a simple on/off<br />

signal, where flexor tension opens the hand and extensor tension<br />

closes it. Depending on the level of the amputation, muscles use<br />

include forearm muscles, or biceps and triceps. Sensory information<br />

may come from visual and auditory cues, such as the sound of<br />

motors, motor vibration, accurate memory of opening-closing time,<br />

and movements of the center of gravity (Law, 1981).<br />

Myoelectric digital on/off control uses a simple EMG threshold<br />

detect to control a switch. When muscle tension reaches a critical level,<br />

it causes the switch to change states, which in turn controls a motor to<br />

direct the hand in one direction or the other. Pinch force between<br />

finger can be indirectly related to the duration of the signal; the longer<br />

the closing motor runs, the harder the fingers pinch. Proportional<br />

myoelectric control is an alternative method of control. Integrated<br />

EMG amplitude varies closely with actual tension generated by muscle<br />

(see Sears & Shaperman, 1991). The EMG controls the motor<br />

directly, designed so that the output of the motor is proportional to the<br />

output of the muscle. With more muscle contraction, the faster the<br />

motor operates. The user has more sensitive slow and fast control of<br />

the hand, depending on the strength of the muscle contraction.<br />

Myoelectric devices have certain advantages (Baumgartner, 198 l),<br />

including no body harness, increased comfort, and more independent<br />

control in bilateral amputations. The disadvantages are that they not<br />

designed for heavy work, their weight is greater, costs are higher, and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!