17.01.2013 Views

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

Chapter 2. Prehension

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Chapter</strong> 6 - During Contact 265<br />

Internal forces: what kinds of internal grasp forces can the hand<br />

apply to the object?<br />

Manipulability: can the fingers impart arbitrary motions to the<br />

object?<br />

Resistance to slipping: how large can the forces and moments on<br />

the object be before the fingers will start to slip?<br />

Stability: will the grasp return to its initial configuration after<br />

being disturbed by an external force or moment?<br />

These quality measures can be applied to the human hand<br />

(Cutkosky & Howe, 1990). All grasps except the gravity dependent<br />

ones satisfy force closure, in that they can control internal forces and<br />

apply positive and negative forces to counteract external forces. The<br />

non-clamping ones satisfy force closure as long as external forces do<br />

not cause the fingers to detach from the object (e.g:, a tray does not<br />

start rising against gravity). Many grasps do not samfy form closure<br />

without friction, meaning that they do not form a complete kinematic<br />

constraint around the object. Instead, the direction of task forces are<br />

anticipated and postures are chosen to counteract only those.<br />

Examples of force closure without form closure include pulling on a<br />

large wrench to loosen a bolt with a hook grasp or holding a<br />

screwdriver in pad opposition while pushing down on it.<br />

Assumptions are made that the wrench will not pull away from the<br />

hand and that the screw will never pull on the screwdriver.<br />

Table 6.5 summarizes Cutkosky and Howe’s analysis of pad<br />

versus palm opposition. Pad opposition has a high manipulability<br />

measure, isotropy, high compliance, low stability, low resistance to<br />

slipping, satisfies force closure, and a connectivity of at least three<br />

degrees of freedom. In English, this means that the fingers can impart<br />

arbitrary motions to the object and accurately apply the forces and<br />

moments, along at least three degrees of freedom. No expected<br />

external force and moment will move the object out of the posture, but<br />

large external forces will cause the object to slip, and if disturbed, the<br />

posture will not return to its initial configuration. With high<br />

compliance (low stiffness), fingers can move rapidly and still<br />

minimize any potential danger to the fingers or object; colliding with<br />

surfaces will cause deflection, instead of damage. A compliant grasp<br />

is more sensitive to small changes in force. In contrast, palm<br />

opposition satisfies form and force closure, is less compliant, more<br />

stable and has a larger resistance to slipping than precision grasps. As<br />

well, palm opposition has a connectivity of zero and a low<br />

manipulability measure. In English, this means that the object is fixed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!