Rapport om gjennomføring av AIFMD i norsk rett - Finanstilsynet
Rapport om gjennomføring av AIFMD i norsk rett - Finanstilsynet
Rapport om gjennomføring av AIFMD i norsk rett - Finanstilsynet
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EN<br />
L 174/50 Official Journal of the European Union 1.7.2011<br />
20. In accordance with Article 29 of Regulation (EU)<br />
No 1095/2010, ESMA shall pr<strong>om</strong>ote an effective bilateral and<br />
multilateral exchange of information between the c<strong>om</strong>petent<br />
authorities of the Member State of reference of the non-EU<br />
AIFM and the c<strong>om</strong>petent authorities of the host Member<br />
States of the AIFM concerned, with full respect for the<br />
applicable confidentiality and data protection provisions<br />
provided for in the relevant Union legislation.<br />
21. In accordance with Article 31 of Regulation (EU)<br />
No 1095/2010, ESMA shall fulfil a general coordination role<br />
between the c<strong>om</strong>petent authority of the Member State of<br />
reference of the non-EU AIFM and the c<strong>om</strong>petent authorities<br />
of the host Member States of the AIFM concerned. In particular,<br />
ESMA may:<br />
(a) facilitate the exchange of information between the<br />
c<strong>om</strong>petent authorities concerned;<br />
(b) determine the scope of the information that the c<strong>om</strong>petent<br />
authority of the Member State of reference must provide to<br />
the c<strong>om</strong>petent authorities of the host Member States<br />
concerned;<br />
(c) take all appropriate measures in case of developments which<br />
may jeopardise the functioning of the financial markets with<br />
a view to facilitating the coordination of actions undertaken<br />
by the c<strong>om</strong>petent authority of the Member State of<br />
reference and the c<strong>om</strong>petent authorities of the host<br />
Member States in relation to non-EU AIFMs.<br />
22. In order to ensure uniform conditions of application of<br />
this Article, ESMA may develop draft implementing technical<br />
standards to determine the form and content of the request<br />
referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 12.<br />
Power is conferred on the C<strong>om</strong>mission to adopt the implementing<br />
technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph<br />
in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU)<br />
No 1095/2010.<br />
23. In order to ensure the uniform application of this Article,<br />
ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards on the<br />
following:<br />
(a) the manner in which an AIFM must c<strong>om</strong>ply with the<br />
requirements laid down in this Directive, taking into<br />
account that the AIFM is established in a third country<br />
and, in particular, the presentation of the information<br />
required in Articles 22 to 24;<br />
(b) the conditions under which the law to which a non-EU<br />
AIFM or a non-EU AIF is subject is considered to provide<br />
for an equivalent rule h<strong>av</strong>ing the same regulatory purpose<br />
and offering the same level of protection to the relevant<br />
investors.<br />
Power is delegated to the C<strong>om</strong>mission to adopt the regulatory<br />
technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in<br />
accordance with Article 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU)<br />
No 1095/2010.<br />
Article 38<br />
Peer review of authorisation and supervision of non-EU<br />
AIFMs<br />
1. ESMA shall, on an annual basis, conduct a peer review<br />
analysis of the supervisory activities of the c<strong>om</strong>petent<br />
authorities in relation to the authorisation and the supervision<br />
of non-EU AIFMs under Articles 37, 39, 40 and 41, to further<br />
enhance consistency in supervisory outc<strong>om</strong>es, in accordance<br />
with Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.<br />
2. By 22 July 2013, ESMA shall develop methods to allow<br />
for objective assessment and c<strong>om</strong>parison between the<br />
authorities reviewed.<br />
3. In particular, the peer review analysis shall include an<br />
assessment of:<br />
(a) the degree of convergence in supervisory practices achieved<br />
in the authorisation and supervision of non-EU AIFMs;<br />
(b) the extent to which the supervisory practice achieves the<br />
objectives set out in this Directive;<br />
(c) the effectiveness and the degree of convergence achieved<br />
with regard to the enforcement of this Directive and its<br />
implementing measures and the regulatory and implementing<br />
technical standards developed by ESMA pursuant<br />
to this Directive, including administrative measures and<br />
penalties imposed against non-EU AIFMs where this<br />
Directive has not been c<strong>om</strong>plied with.<br />
4. On the basis of the conclusions of the peer review, ESMA<br />
may issue guidelines and rec<strong>om</strong>mendations pursuant to<br />
Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, with a view to<br />
establishing consistent, efficient and effective supervisory<br />
practices of non-EU AIFMs.<br />
5. The c<strong>om</strong>petent authorities shall make every effort to<br />
c<strong>om</strong>ply with those guidelines and rec<strong>om</strong>mendations.<br />
6. Within 2 months of the issuance of a guideline or rec<strong>om</strong>mendation,<br />
each c<strong>om</strong>petent authority shall confirm whether it<br />
c<strong>om</strong>plies or intends to c<strong>om</strong>ply with that guideline or rec<strong>om</strong>mendation.<br />
In the event that a c<strong>om</strong>petent authority does not<br />
c<strong>om</strong>ply or intend to c<strong>om</strong>ply, it shall inform ESMA, stating its<br />
reasons.<br />
7. ESMA shall publish the fact that a c<strong>om</strong>petent authority<br />
does not c<strong>om</strong>ply or intend to c<strong>om</strong>ply with that guideline or<br />
rec<strong>om</strong>mendation. ESMA may also decide, on a case-by-case<br />
basis, to publish the reasons provided by the c<strong>om</strong>petent<br />
authority for not c<strong>om</strong>plying with that guideline or rec<strong>om</strong>mendation.<br />
The c<strong>om</strong>petent authority shall receive advance notice of<br />
such a publication.