28.02.2013 Views

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STRUCTURAL THEORY 5.99<br />

Similarly, a beam made of a ductile material continues to carry more load after<br />

the stresses in the outer surfaces reach the yield point. However, the stresses will<br />

no longer vary with distance from the neutral axis, so the flexure formula [Eq.<br />

(5.54)] no longer holds. However, if simplifying assumptions are made, approximating<br />

the stress-strain relationship beyond the elastic limit, the load-carrying ca-<br />

pacity of the beam can be computed with satisfactory accuracy.<br />

FIGURE 5.79 Stress-strain relationship for a<br />

ductile material generally is similar to the curve<br />

shown in (a). To simplify plastic analysis, the<br />

portion of (a) enclosed by the dash lines is approximated<br />

by the curve in (b), which extends<br />

to the range where strain hardening begins.<br />

Modulus of rupture is defined as<br />

the stress computed from the flexure<br />

formula for the maximum bending moment<br />

a beam sustains at failure. This is<br />

not a true stress but it is sometimes used<br />

to compare the strength of beams.<br />

For a ductile material, the idealized<br />

stress-strain relationship in Fig. 5.79b<br />

may be assumed. Stress is proportional<br />

to strain until the yield-point stress ƒ y is<br />

reached, after which strain increases at<br />

a constant stress.<br />

For a beam of this material, the following<br />

assumptions will also be made:<br />

1. Plane sections remain plane, strains<br />

thus being proportional to distance<br />

from the neutral axis.<br />

2. Properties of the material in tension<br />

are the same as those in compression.<br />

3. Its fibers behave the same in flexure<br />

as in tension.<br />

4. Deformations remain small.<br />

Strain distribution across the cross<br />

section of a rectangular beam, based on<br />

these assumptions, is shown in Fig. 5.80a. At the yield point, the unit strain is � y<br />

<strong>and</strong> the curvature � y, as indicated in (1). In (2), the strain has increased several<br />

times, but the section still remains plane. Finally, at failure, (3), the strains are very<br />

large <strong>and</strong> nearly constant across upper <strong>and</strong> lower halves of the section.<br />

Corresponding stress distributions are shown in Fig. 5.80b. At the yield point,<br />

(1), stresses vary linearly <strong>and</strong> the maximum if ƒ y. With increase in load, more <strong>and</strong><br />

more fibers reach the yield point, <strong>and</strong> the stress distribution becomes nearly constant,<br />

as indicated in (2). Finally, at failure, (3), the stresses are constant across the<br />

top <strong>and</strong> bottom parts of the section <strong>and</strong> equal to the yield-point stress.<br />

The resisting moment at failure for a rectangular beam can be computed from<br />

the stress diagram for stage 3. If b is the width of the member <strong>and</strong> d its depth, then<br />

the ultimate moment for a rectangular beam is<br />

2 bd<br />

Mp � ƒ y<br />

(5.141)<br />

4<br />

Since the resisting moment at stage 1 is M y � ƒ ybd 2 /6, the beam carries 50% more<br />

moment before failure than when the yield-point stress is first reached at the outer<br />

surfaces.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!