28.02.2013 Views

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION 9.33<br />

as well as recommended maximum spacings <strong>and</strong> details for use, are given in the<br />

CRSI ‘‘Manual for St<strong>and</strong>ard Practice.’’<br />

Wire bar supports are generally available in the United States in three classes<br />

of rust prevention: plastic-protected, stainless-steel-protected, <strong>and</strong> no protection<br />

(plain). Precast-concrete bar supports are normally supplied in three styles; plain<br />

block, block with embedded wires, <strong>and</strong> block with a hole for the leg of a vertical<br />

bar for top- <strong>and</strong> bottom-bar support.<br />

Various types <strong>and</strong> sizes of all-plastic bar supports <strong>and</strong> sideform spacers are<br />

available. Consideration should be given to the effects of thermal changes, inasmuch<br />

as the coefficient of thermal expansion of the plastic can differ significantly from<br />

that of concrete. Investigation of this property is advisable before use of all-plastic<br />

supports in concrete that will be exposed to high variations in temperature.<br />

Bar supports for use with epoxy-coated rebars should be made of dielectric<br />

material. Alternatively, wire bar supports should be coated with dielectric material,<br />

such as plastic or epoxy.<br />

9.27 INSPECTION OF REINFORCEMENT<br />

This involves approval of rebar material for conformance to the physical properties<br />

required, such as ASTM specifications for the strength grade specified; approval of<br />

the bar details <strong>and</strong> placing drawings; approval of fabrication to meet the approved<br />

details within the prescribed tolerances; <strong>and</strong> approval of rebar placing.<br />

Approvals of rebar material may be made on the basis of mill tests performed<br />

by the manufacturer for each heat from which the bars used originated. If samples<br />

are to be taken for independent strength tests, measurements of deformations, bending<br />

tests, <strong>and</strong> minimum weight, the routine samples may be best secured at the mill<br />

or the fabrication shop before fabrication. Occasionally, samples for check tests are<br />

taken in the field; but in this case, provision should be made for extra lengths of<br />

bars to be shipped <strong>and</strong> for schedules for the completion of such tests before the<br />

material is required for placing. Sampling at the point of fabrication, before fabrication,<br />

is recommended.<br />

Inspection of fabrication <strong>and</strong> placement is usually most conveniently performed<br />

in the field, where gross errors would require correction in any event.<br />

Under the ACI 318 <strong>Building</strong> Code, the bars should be free of oil, paint, form<br />

coatings, <strong>and</strong> mud when placed. Rust or mill scale sufficiently loose to damage the<br />

bond is normally dislodged in h<strong>and</strong>ling.<br />

If heavily rusted bars (which may result from improper storage for a long time<br />

exposed to rusting conditions) are discovered at the time of placing, a quick field<br />

test of suitability requires only scales, a wire brush, <strong>and</strong> calipers. In this test, a<br />

measured length of the bar is wire-brushed manually <strong>and</strong> weighed. If less than 94%<br />

of the nominal weight remains, or if the height of the deformations is deficient, the<br />

rust is deemed excessive. In either case, the material may then be rejected or penalized<br />

as structurally inadequate. Where space permits placing additional bars to<br />

make up the structural deficiency (in anchorage capacity or weight), as in walls<br />

<strong>and</strong> slabs, this solution is preferred, because construction delay then is avoided.<br />

Where project specifications impose requirements on rust more severe than the<br />

structural requirements of the ACI 318 <strong>Building</strong> Code, for example, for decorative<br />

surfaces exposed to weather, the inspection should employ the special criteria required.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!