28.02.2013 Views

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STRUCTURAL THEORY 5.149<br />

An approximation of impact stresses in the elastic range can be made by neglecting<br />

the inertia of the body struck <strong>and</strong> the effect of wave propagation <strong>and</strong><br />

assuming that the kinetic energy is converted completely into strain energy in that<br />

body. Consider a prismatic bar subjected to an axial impact load in tension. The<br />

energy absorbed per unit of volume when the bar is stressed to the proportional<br />

2<br />

limit is called the modulus of resilience. It is given by ƒ /2E, where ƒy is the yield<br />

stress <strong>and</strong> E the modulus of elasticity, both in psi.<br />

Below the proportional limit, the unit stress, psi, due to an axial load U, in-lb,<br />

is<br />

y<br />

2UE<br />

ƒ � � (5.260)<br />

AL<br />

where A is the cross-sectional area, in 2 , <strong>and</strong> L the length of bar, in. This equation<br />

indicates that, for a given unit stress, energy absorption of a member may be improved<br />

by increasing its length or area. Sharp changes in cross section should be<br />

avoided, however, because of associated high stress concentrations. Also, uneven<br />

distribution of stress in a member due to changes in section should be avoided. For<br />

example, if part of a member is given twice the diameter of another part, the stress<br />

under axial load in the larger portion is one-fourth that in the smaller. Since the<br />

energy absorbed is proportional to the square of the stress, the energy taken per<br />

unit of volume by the larger portion is therefore only one-sixteenth that absorbed<br />

by the smaller. So despite the increase in volume caused by doubling of the diameter,<br />

the larger portion absorbs much less energy than the smaller. Thus, energy<br />

absorption would be larger with a uniform stress distribution throughout the length<br />

of the member.<br />

Impact on Short Members. If a static axial load W would produce a tensile stress<br />

ƒ� in the bar <strong>and</strong> an elongation e�, in, then the axial stress produced in a short<br />

member when W falls a distance h, in, is<br />

2h<br />

ƒ � ƒ� � ƒ� �1 � (5.261)<br />

e�<br />

if ƒ is within the proportional limit. The elongation due to this impact load is<br />

2h<br />

e � e� � e� �1 � (5.262)<br />

e�<br />

These equations indicate that the stress <strong>and</strong> deformation due to an energy load may<br />

be considerably larger than those produced by the same weight applied gradually.<br />

The same equations hold for a beam with constant cross section struck by a<br />

weight at midspan, except that ƒ <strong>and</strong> ƒ� represent stresses at midspan <strong>and</strong> e <strong>and</strong> e�,<br />

midspan deflections.<br />

According to Eqs. (5.261) <strong>and</strong> (5.262), a sudden load (h � 0) causes twice the<br />

stress <strong>and</strong> twice the deflection as the same load applied gradually.<br />

Impact on Long Members. For very long members, the effect of wave propagation<br />

should be taken into account. Impact is not transmitted instantly to all parts of<br />

the struck body. At first, remote parts remain undisturbed, while particles struck<br />

accelerate rapidly to the velocity of the colliding body. The deformations produced

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!