28.02.2013 Views

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

Building Design and Construction Handbook - Merritt - Ventech!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.66 SECTION SIX<br />

TABLE 6.14 Allowable Bearing Pressures<br />

Material type<br />

Allowable bearing<br />

pressure a<br />

Maximum allowable<br />

bearing pressure b<br />

Massive crystalline bedrock 4,000 psf (200 kPa) 12,000 psf (600 kPa)<br />

Sedimentary <strong>and</strong> foliated rock 2,000 psf (100 kPa) 6,000 psf (300 kPa)<br />

Gravel <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong>y gravel (GW, GP) 2,000 psf (100 kPa) 6,000 psf (300 kPa)<br />

Nonplastic soil: s<strong>and</strong>s, silts, <strong>and</strong> NP silt 1,500 psf (75 kPa) 4,500 psf (220 kPa)<br />

(GM, SW, SP, SM) c<br />

Plastic soil: silts <strong>and</strong> clays (ML, MH, SC,<br />

CL, CH) c<br />

1,000 psf (50 kPa) 3,000 psf (150 kPa) d<br />

a Minimum footing width <strong>and</strong> embedment depth equals 1 ft (0.3 m).<br />

b An increase of 20% of the allowable bearing pressure is allowed for each additional foot (0.3 m) of<br />

width or depth up to the maximum allowable bearing pressures listed in Column 3. An exception is plastic<br />

soil, see note d.<br />

c Group symbols from Table 6.8.<br />

d No increase in the allowable bearing pressure is allowed for an increase in width of the footing.<br />

For dense or stiff soils, allowable bearing values in this table are generally conservative. For very loose<br />

or very soft soils, the allowable bearing values may be too high.<br />

Source: Data from ‘‘Uniform <strong>Building</strong> Code’’ (1997)<br />

There are many charts, graphs, <strong>and</strong> figures that present bearing capacity factors<br />

developed by different engineers <strong>and</strong> researchers based on varying assumptions. For<br />

example, Fig. 6.28 presents bearing capacity factors N c, N �, <strong>and</strong> N q, which automatically<br />

incorporate allowance for punching <strong>and</strong> local shear failure. Another example<br />

is Fig. 6.29, which presents bearing capacity factors that have not been<br />

adjusted for punching or local shear failure. Figure 6.29 also presents the bearing<br />

capacity equations for square, rectangular, <strong>and</strong> circular footings. The equations for<br />

granular soil (i.e., cohesionless soil, c � 0) <strong>and</strong> for a total stress analysis for cohesive<br />

soil (i.e., � � 0 <strong>and</strong> c � s u) are also shown in Fig. 6.29.<br />

Other Footing Loads. In addition to the vertical load acting on the footing, it<br />

may also be subjected to a lateral load. A common procedure is to treat lateral<br />

loads separately <strong>and</strong> resist the lateral loads by using the soil pressure acting on the<br />

sides of the footing (passive pressure) <strong>and</strong> the frictional resistance along the bottom<br />

of the footing.<br />

It is always desirable to design <strong>and</strong> construct shallow footings so that the vertical<br />

load is applied at the center of gravity of the footing. For combined footings that<br />

carry more than one vertical load, the combined footing should be designed <strong>and</strong><br />

constructed so that the vertical loads are symmetric. There may be design situations<br />

where the footing is subjected to a moment, such as where there is a fixed-end<br />

connection between the building frame <strong>and</strong> the footing. This moment can be represented<br />

by a load Q that is offset a certain distance (known as the eccentricity)<br />

from the center of gravity of the footing. For other projects, there may be property<br />

line constraints <strong>and</strong> the load must be offset a certain distance (eccentricity) from<br />

the center of gravity of the footing. Because an eccentrically loaded footing will<br />

create a higher bearing pressure under one side as compared to the opposite side,<br />

one approach is to evaluate the actual pressure distribution beneath the footing. The<br />

usual procedure is to assume a rigid footing (hence linear pressure distribution) <strong>and</strong><br />

use the section modulus ( 1 ⁄6B 2 ) in order to calculate the largest <strong>and</strong> lowest bearing<br />

pressure. For a footing having a width B, the largest (q�) <strong>and</strong> lowest (q�) bearing<br />

pressures are as follows:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!