04.03.2013 Views

food-and-wine-pairing-a-sensory-experience-robert-harrington

food-and-wine-pairing-a-sensory-experience-robert-harrington

food-and-wine-pairing-a-sensory-experience-robert-harrington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

light in the case of poached or steamed white fish to very powerful in the case of grilled or<br />

blackened venison or elk. This relationship is impacted by the protein type, fattiness level,<br />

<strong>and</strong> cooking method.<br />

Moist heat cooking methods are those where heat is conducted to the <strong>food</strong> item by a<br />

liquid <strong>and</strong> include methods such as steaming, boiling, <strong>and</strong> braising. Cooking methods defined<br />

as dry heat methods are those where heat is conducted to the <strong>food</strong> item by hot air (roasting,<br />

baking), hot metal (grilling, blackening), radiation (broiling), <strong>and</strong> hot fat (stir-frying, sautéing,<br />

pan-frying, deep-frying). These cooking methods impact not only the amount of fat<br />

retained in the finished dish but also the protein <strong>and</strong> collagen structure. When a dry heat<br />

method is utilized, the structure of the dish can be very different than if moist heat is used.<br />

A dry heat cooking method often allows excess fat to run off (grilling is an example), whereas<br />

moist heat often reincorporates the fats that melt off back into the <strong>food</strong> as part of the sauce,<br />

such as in a rich beef stew. Conversely, some dry heat methods such as pan-frying <strong>and</strong> deepfrying<br />

increase the fat content in the finished <strong>food</strong> item. In many cases the browning or<br />

charring that is sometimes a part of dry heat cooking creates a more powerful structure than<br />

a moist cooking method would. This explains how a lighter protein prepared using a more<br />

robust cooking method will have a more powerful texture than the protein type alone would<br />

suggest. For instance, sea bass cooked on a grill has a more powerful texture than chicken<br />

done by a moist heat method (poached, for instance).<br />

In Table 8.1, the protein listed in the first column <strong>and</strong> the moist cooking method in<br />

the second column interact to create the anticipated body level indicated in the third column<br />

(Anticipated Body Levels). The interaction of the dry cooking method in the Dry Cooking<br />

Methods column with the protein type in the fourth column creates the anticipated body<br />

level shown in the far right-h<strong>and</strong> column. These are but a few examples, but as you can<br />

imagine, there are numerous other protein type <strong>and</strong> cooking method interactions, <strong>and</strong> you<br />

may also find yourself eating a dish prepared using a variety of cooking methods.<br />

Meats prepared with robust cooking methods such as roasting or grilling should be<br />

paired with young reds with high tannin to match robustness with robustness. Robust cooking<br />

methods require <strong>wine</strong> with a strong enough personality to balance the powerful textures<br />

added to the dish. Bigger reds or big whites pair well with dishes prepared using robust<br />

cooking methods. White <strong>wine</strong>s that provide an effective contrast with robust cooking methods<br />

range from dry Fino or Manzanilla sherry to German Kabinett. The opposite end of<br />

the cooking method continuum (poaching, steaming, etc.) requires a similarity match, which<br />

can be achieved by <strong>pairing</strong> these finished dishes with neutral, light-bodied <strong>wine</strong>s.<br />

OVERALL FOOD BODY<br />

The overall <strong>food</strong> body is a texture element based on your perception of the overall<br />

power or body of the prepared dish. This evaluation takes the following factors into consideration:<br />

protein type, fat level, cooking method, <strong>and</strong> what the item is served with—<br />

basically the range of texture factors that provide a feeling of weight or structure throughout<br />

your mouth. The most basic assessment of <strong>food</strong> body is based on a continuum from light<br />

to very rich.<br />

The type of <strong>food</strong> item <strong>and</strong> the temperature at which it is served impact the definition<br />

<strong>and</strong> perception of its body. For warm <strong>and</strong> cool items, body characteristics may include the<br />

consistency, viscosity, richness, <strong>and</strong> toughness of the <strong>food</strong>. For frozen items such as ice cream,<br />

body may be associated with the melting characteristics in your mouth. Does it quickly melt<br />

away <strong>and</strong> give the impression of lightness? Or does it resist melting <strong>and</strong> create a rich feeling<br />

in the mouth?<br />

The examples of overall <strong>food</strong> body included in the Food Sensory Anchor Sheet (Figure<br />

B.1) presented in this chapter’s exercises provide ascending levels of body derived from a<br />

combination of protein type, cooking method, <strong>and</strong> fattiness of the prepared dish. These<br />

provide a good example of variation in overall body <strong>and</strong> texture in finished <strong>food</strong> dishes.<br />

Overall Food Body 171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!