food-and-wine-pairing-a-sensory-experience-robert-harrington
food-and-wine-pairing-a-sensory-experience-robert-harrington
food-and-wine-pairing-a-sensory-experience-robert-harrington
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
66<br />
Chapter 4 Gastronomic Identity II: Food <strong>and</strong> Cuisine<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Whether tourists are described as ‘‘visitors in their own<br />
region’’ or by the more traditional concept of someone traveling<br />
to a new area for business or leisure, local cuisine is<br />
frequently as an important factor for tourists, especially those<br />
interested in <strong>wine</strong> or culinary tourism. A growing industry<br />
trend over the past two or three decades has been an interest<br />
in regional <strong>food</strong>s, cultural diversity, culinary tourism, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
idea of gastronomic identity. The Aperitif featuring Chef John<br />
Folse demonstrates how this interest is being capitalized on<br />
in the business world. In the <strong>food</strong>service industry, whether the<br />
identity is based on the firm location or the overriding theme<br />
of a restaurant concept, a determination <strong>and</strong> definition of the<br />
gastronomic identity of the location of interest provides an<br />
important area of differentiation for the firm or unit.<br />
This general trend appears to be in part a continuation<br />
of the ‘‘identity movement’’ of the 1960s <strong>and</strong> 1970s that fostered<br />
nouvelle cuisine <strong>and</strong> other social movements. 1 General<br />
research indicates that identity movements can have an evolutionary<br />
<strong>and</strong> lasting impact on professions, professional<br />
identity, <strong>and</strong> ultimately consumers’ expectations. Rao <strong>and</strong> colleagues<br />
described the French nouvelle cuisine movement of<br />
the 1970s as a social reaction that followed similar movements<br />
in the theater, film, <strong>and</strong> art communities of the time. Institutional<br />
logics <strong>and</strong> role identities in the culinary community<br />
were refined from classical French traditions to nouvelle exploration.<br />
Rao <strong>and</strong> colleagues described five dimensions that<br />
changed during this process: culinary rhetoric, the rules of<br />
cooking, archetypal ingredients, the role of the chef, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
organization of the menu. 2<br />
The main defining characteristic of culinary rhetoric is<br />
a change in the name of dishes from the classical methods to<br />
the nouvelle. The culinary rhetoric of the classic period utilized<br />
names based on places or on names of nobles <strong>and</strong> largerthan-life<br />
patrons of famous restaurants. Nouvelle cuisine focused<br />
on the use of poetry, imagination, <strong>and</strong> innovation in<br />
menu language based on a theory of ‘‘exceptions, nuances,<br />
[<strong>and</strong>] refinements.’’ 3 The rules of cooking during the classical<br />
period focused on conformity to the principles of Escoffier.<br />
The rules of cooking in the nouvelle cuisine movement featured<br />
new ingredients <strong>and</strong> new cooking techniques <strong>and</strong> presented<br />
old ingredients/techniques in new ways. Archetypal<br />
ingredients of classical cuisine include ‘‘high game, shellfish,<br />
cream, poultry, [<strong>and</strong>] river fish,’’ 4 while nouvelle cuisine features<br />
‘‘fruits, vegetables, potatoes, aromatic herbs, exotic ingredients,<br />
[<strong>and</strong>] sea fish.’’ 5 The nouvelle movement moved the<br />
chef to the center of operations, removing flambéing <strong>and</strong><br />
other tableside preparations from the role of the front of the<br />
house. Finally, the organization of the menu became very narrow<br />
(even going so far as the elimination of the menu) <strong>and</strong><br />
focused on the cuisine of the market or season to maximize<br />
the emphasis on freshness.<br />
To me, the nouvelle cuisine identity movement demonstrates<br />
that a cuisine, dining habits, recipes, <strong>and</strong> etiquette<br />
are entrenched in tradition. Changes in what, how, when,<br />
where, <strong>and</strong> why a society eats <strong>and</strong> drinks can be evolutionary<br />
or revolutionary (as was the case for nouvelle cuisine).<br />
Danhi as well as Rao <strong>and</strong> colleagues identify many important<br />
factors for defining a cuisine <strong>and</strong> a culinary identity<br />
movement. While a number of factors influence agri-<strong>food</strong> systems<br />
in societies, 6 the restaurant profession, <strong>and</strong> the logic of<br />
institutional <strong>food</strong>service, this chapter focuses on a gastronomic<br />
identity perspective in describing <strong>food</strong> characteristics<br />
of a region. This chapter uses the framework presented in<br />
Chapter 3 (see Figure 3.2) to contemplate relationships <strong>and</strong><br />
their impact on the what, how, where, when, <strong>and</strong> why of local<br />
eating, using both Old World <strong>and</strong> New World examples. This<br />
framework can be a useful model for gastronomic tourism<br />
strategic planning as well as restaurant concepts centered on<br />
regional <strong>and</strong> local cuisine.