04.03.2013 Views

food-and-wine-pairing-a-sensory-experience-robert-harrington

food-and-wine-pairing-a-sensory-experience-robert-harrington

food-and-wine-pairing-a-sensory-experience-robert-harrington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66<br />

Chapter 4 Gastronomic Identity II: Food <strong>and</strong> Cuisine<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Whether tourists are described as ‘‘visitors in their own<br />

region’’ or by the more traditional concept of someone traveling<br />

to a new area for business or leisure, local cuisine is<br />

frequently as an important factor for tourists, especially those<br />

interested in <strong>wine</strong> or culinary tourism. A growing industry<br />

trend over the past two or three decades has been an interest<br />

in regional <strong>food</strong>s, cultural diversity, culinary tourism, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

idea of gastronomic identity. The Aperitif featuring Chef John<br />

Folse demonstrates how this interest is being capitalized on<br />

in the business world. In the <strong>food</strong>service industry, whether the<br />

identity is based on the firm location or the overriding theme<br />

of a restaurant concept, a determination <strong>and</strong> definition of the<br />

gastronomic identity of the location of interest provides an<br />

important area of differentiation for the firm or unit.<br />

This general trend appears to be in part a continuation<br />

of the ‘‘identity movement’’ of the 1960s <strong>and</strong> 1970s that fostered<br />

nouvelle cuisine <strong>and</strong> other social movements. 1 General<br />

research indicates that identity movements can have an evolutionary<br />

<strong>and</strong> lasting impact on professions, professional<br />

identity, <strong>and</strong> ultimately consumers’ expectations. Rao <strong>and</strong> colleagues<br />

described the French nouvelle cuisine movement of<br />

the 1970s as a social reaction that followed similar movements<br />

in the theater, film, <strong>and</strong> art communities of the time. Institutional<br />

logics <strong>and</strong> role identities in the culinary community<br />

were refined from classical French traditions to nouvelle exploration.<br />

Rao <strong>and</strong> colleagues described five dimensions that<br />

changed during this process: culinary rhetoric, the rules of<br />

cooking, archetypal ingredients, the role of the chef, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

organization of the menu. 2<br />

The main defining characteristic of culinary rhetoric is<br />

a change in the name of dishes from the classical methods to<br />

the nouvelle. The culinary rhetoric of the classic period utilized<br />

names based on places or on names of nobles <strong>and</strong> largerthan-life<br />

patrons of famous restaurants. Nouvelle cuisine focused<br />

on the use of poetry, imagination, <strong>and</strong> innovation in<br />

menu language based on a theory of ‘‘exceptions, nuances,<br />

[<strong>and</strong>] refinements.’’ 3 The rules of cooking during the classical<br />

period focused on conformity to the principles of Escoffier.<br />

The rules of cooking in the nouvelle cuisine movement featured<br />

new ingredients <strong>and</strong> new cooking techniques <strong>and</strong> presented<br />

old ingredients/techniques in new ways. Archetypal<br />

ingredients of classical cuisine include ‘‘high game, shellfish,<br />

cream, poultry, [<strong>and</strong>] river fish,’’ 4 while nouvelle cuisine features<br />

‘‘fruits, vegetables, potatoes, aromatic herbs, exotic ingredients,<br />

[<strong>and</strong>] sea fish.’’ 5 The nouvelle movement moved the<br />

chef to the center of operations, removing flambéing <strong>and</strong><br />

other tableside preparations from the role of the front of the<br />

house. Finally, the organization of the menu became very narrow<br />

(even going so far as the elimination of the menu) <strong>and</strong><br />

focused on the cuisine of the market or season to maximize<br />

the emphasis on freshness.<br />

To me, the nouvelle cuisine identity movement demonstrates<br />

that a cuisine, dining habits, recipes, <strong>and</strong> etiquette<br />

are entrenched in tradition. Changes in what, how, when,<br />

where, <strong>and</strong> why a society eats <strong>and</strong> drinks can be evolutionary<br />

or revolutionary (as was the case for nouvelle cuisine).<br />

Danhi as well as Rao <strong>and</strong> colleagues identify many important<br />

factors for defining a cuisine <strong>and</strong> a culinary identity<br />

movement. While a number of factors influence agri-<strong>food</strong> systems<br />

in societies, 6 the restaurant profession, <strong>and</strong> the logic of<br />

institutional <strong>food</strong>service, this chapter focuses on a gastronomic<br />

identity perspective in describing <strong>food</strong> characteristics<br />

of a region. This chapter uses the framework presented in<br />

Chapter 3 (see Figure 3.2) to contemplate relationships <strong>and</strong><br />

their impact on the what, how, where, when, <strong>and</strong> why of local<br />

eating, using both Old World <strong>and</strong> New World examples. This<br />

framework can be a useful model for gastronomic tourism<br />

strategic planning as well as restaurant concepts centered on<br />

regional <strong>and</strong> local cuisine.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!