04.03.2013 Views

food-and-wine-pairing-a-sensory-experience-robert-harrington

food-and-wine-pairing-a-sensory-experience-robert-harrington

food-and-wine-pairing-a-sensory-experience-robert-harrington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

254<br />

Chapter 11 Menu Planning: Horizontal <strong>and</strong> Vertical Pairing Decisions<br />

Sweetness Match<br />

No Yes<br />

Figure 11.3<br />

Components Texture Flavors<br />

Acidity Match<br />

No Yes<br />

Salty Foods?<br />

No Yes<br />

Bitter Foods?<br />

Yes<br />

Moderate to High<br />

Effervescence?<br />

No Yes<br />

No<br />

Fattiness/Tannin Match or<br />

Fattiness/Wine Acid Match<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

Overall Body<br />

No<br />

Spiciness Match or Food<br />

Spicy/Wine Sweetness Match<br />

No Match Refreshment Neutral Good Match Synergistic Match<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

Intensity Match<br />

No Yes<br />

Persistency Match<br />

No<br />

Flavor Type Match<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />

Wine <strong>and</strong> Food Pairing Decision Tree<br />

match? Figure 11.4 provides a format for quantifying the <strong>wine</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> associations based<br />

on the relationships shown in the decision tree (Figure 11.3), the twelve matching rules<br />

discussed in earlier chapters, <strong>and</strong> the visual profiles of the <strong>wine</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> items developed<br />

in the first two parts of the <strong>pairing</strong> instrument.<br />

In the following examples, two <strong>wine</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>pairing</strong> profiles are presented. These<br />

items were selected from a five-course menu created by students in one of my previous <strong>wine</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>pairing</strong> classes. When the menu was prepared, the entire class tasted <strong>and</strong> evaluated<br />

it, along with two <strong>wine</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> experts. The match scores generated by the students using<br />

the Wine <strong>and</strong> Food Pairing Instrument strongly correlated with the <strong>wine</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> experts’<br />

scores of perceived level of match. This finding provides support for this method of predicting<br />

match based on profiles <strong>and</strong> quantifying relationships. 6<br />

The five-course menu <strong>and</strong> <strong>wine</strong> matches selected by the student groups are presented<br />

in Figure 11.5. Under each menu <strong>and</strong> <strong>wine</strong> item description, there is a match score based<br />

on the 0–10 scale shown in the Wine <strong>and</strong> Food Pairing Decision Tree; it was calculated as<br />

the average level of perceived match across fifteen participants. As you can see, the average<br />

match scores ranged from a low of 3.5 (the cheese course) to a high of 9 (for the lamb<br />

course).<br />

Example 1 First, let us consider the pasta course. The <strong>food</strong> item was a combination<br />

of smoked corn, grilled chicken, Alfredo sauce, <strong>and</strong> penne pasta. The <strong>wine</strong> was a New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong> Sauvignon Blanc. Figure 11.6 provides a profile of the component, texture, <strong>and</strong><br />

flavor relationships for this dish <strong>and</strong> the <strong>wine</strong>.<br />

Figure 11.7 provides a score following the Quantifying Wine <strong>and</strong> Food Profiles to<br />

Predict Match Level sheet (Figure 11.4) using the Wine <strong>and</strong> Food Pairing Decision Tree as<br />

a guide.<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

Yes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!