Attachment 1-7 - City of Ryde
Attachment 1-7 - City of Ryde
Attachment 1-7 - City of Ryde
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Council <strong>Attachment</strong>s Page 244<br />
ITEM 12 (continued) ATTACHMENT 7<br />
Proposed Amendment Basis for amendment<br />
- Amend the HOB map for the<br />
corresponding area mentioned<br />
above to a height <strong>of</strong> 18.5 m.<br />
- Amend HOB Map to make<br />
area E as referred to in Clause<br />
4.3(2A) to correspond with<br />
area described above.<br />
- Amend FSR Map for <strong>Ryde</strong><br />
Town Centre by combining<br />
area H and I into area H.<br />
- Amend Clause (4.4)(2A) as<br />
follows;<br />
Subclause (h) amended to<br />
read<br />
- (h) 0.5:1 if the building is in<br />
area H and if the building is on<br />
a site having an area <strong>of</strong> at<br />
least 900sqm and provides<br />
laneway access and is mixed<br />
development.<br />
- Clause 2 (4.4)(2A) (i) to be<br />
deleted<br />
15. Update the DLEP 2011 <strong>Ryde</strong><br />
Civic Precinct map to include<br />
additional areas as identified in<br />
Draft DCP 2011 - Part 4.4<br />
<strong>Ryde</strong> Town Centre<br />
16. Amend clause 4.3 (2C) so that<br />
the maximum height for<br />
dwellings in both multi dwelling<br />
housing and dual occupancy<br />
development that do not have<br />
frontage to a street is 5m.<br />
17. Schedule 2 Exempt<br />
development - Amend controls<br />
for Signage (real estate sign<br />
for a residential site)<br />
<strong>Attachment</strong> 7 - Council report 24 July 2012 - Draft <strong>Ryde</strong> LEP 2011 -<br />
Submissions<br />
Determination <strong>of</strong> precincts for <strong>Ryde</strong><br />
Town Centre completed after<br />
submission <strong>of</strong> DLEP to DoPI .<br />
Consistency between LEP and DCP<br />
required.<br />
The clause at present only applies to<br />
multi dwelling housing developments<br />
and to ensure consistent controls<br />
exist governing the height <strong>of</strong> all rear<br />
dwellings the clause should include<br />
dual occupancy developments,<br />
An error occurred in the Schedule in<br />
that the controls for Signage (retail<br />
premises windows) was repeated for<br />
Signage(real estate sign for a<br />
residential site). It is proposed to<br />
reinstate the existing controls under<br />
LEP 2010 for Signage(real estate<br />
sign for a residential site).<br />
18. Amend LEP 2011 Heritage Council has one archaeological