Attachment 1-7 - City of Ryde

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Attachment 5 - Table 5 Submissions in Support/Against/Other comments Council Attachments Page 29 ITEM 12 (continued) ATTACHMENT 5 Area/Group No. Subs Issue Response Reason Existing Controls/ 80 Objections to:- 1. There are no changes proposed to Eltham Open Space/ 1. Eltham Street Gladesville - Street in the DLEP.The DDCP provides details Environment/Other DLEP and DDCP will cause the of a potential accessway abutting the rear of environmental capacity of Eltham properties in Eltham Street. This is a DCP (all submissions St to be exceeded and matter and will be reviewed when submissions expressing significantly reduce amenity of on the DDCP are presented to Council. concern over the street. 2. See background information. There are no existing controls- 2. Heights along Victoria Rd changes proposed to height and floor space for 79 counted in and Farm St. properties along Victoria Rd. Against DLEP) 3. Loss of sunlight, visual 3. Residential amenity, traffic management and pollution, traffic, increased noise, road safety, increased pressure on amenities parking will be addressed as part of any DA. Meadowbank Support DLEP 7 Against DLEP 0 Existing Controls/ Open Space/ Environment/Other Macquarie Park 0 Support DLEP 0 Against DLEP 1 Concern that Land Zoning Map shows No change In line with Council resolution of 5 May 2009 that LEP section of Council roadway in proposed 2010 Land Zoning Map be amended by zoning the Macquarie Estate with a zoning of RE1 road to RE1 for the length of the boundary that the Public Recreation. zone/park abuts that road. The zoning referred to in the submission is a result of this resolution. Existing Controls/ 3 1. Request incentive for new hotel No change 1. Not considered appropriate for Council to be Open Space/ accommodation within N Ryde proposed involved in benefiting specific land uses within Environment/Other and Macquarie Park including – in any zone.
Council Attachments Page 30 ITEM 12 (continued) ATTACHMENT 5 Area/Group No. Subs Issue Response Reason Floor space bonuses. Ryde Support DLEP 11 Against DLEP 0 Existing Controls/ Open Space/ Environment/Other General Support DLEP 3 Against DLEP 0 Existing Controls/ Open Space/ Environment/Other 2. Concerns raised are that Clause 4.4B Macquarie Park Floor space ratio has been deleted. The submission requests that an incentive clause be re – instated in the LEP . 3. Land use table amended to be clearer that industries and neighbourhood shops are permitted in B3 and B7 zones. 1 DLEP 2011 has Ryde Civic Precinct at RL130 this was a result of a spot rezoning . Submission requests that height be readjusted to RL90. 15 1. Clarification sought re ability to strata subdivide shop and dwelling. 2. DLEP does not incorporate zoning for linking and moving between open space areas in Ryde. Attachment 5 - Table 5 Submissions in Support/Against/Other comments No change proposed No change proposed No change proposed. No change required No change proposed 2. Planning provisions for Corridor under review – separate process to DLEP 2011. 3. Land use table is presented in accordance with DoPI and SI requirements. The Height Map indicates heights for the Civic Centre that vary from 75m to 0m. This has been a direct transfer from LEP 2010 (Amendment 2) that was gazetted on 2 March 2012. 1. Strata subdivision of the uses is permitted. 2. The provision of linkages is identified in the Integrated Open Space Strategy. This is a high level document that will result in the development of management plans to guide the provisions and use of open space including
Page 1 and 2: ATTACHMENTS FOR: AGENDA NO. 23/12 C
Page 3 and 4: Attachment 1 - Table 1 Amendments t
Page 5 and 6: Attachment 1 - Table 1 Amendments t
Page 7 and 8: Council Attachments Page 6 ITEM 12
Page 15 and 16: 3. 3 - 9 Angus St Meadowbank - requ
Page 17 and 18: Attachment 4 - Table 4 Details of r
Page 19 and 20: 4. Requests that residential accomm
Page 27 and 28: NSW Land and Housing Corporation In
Page 29: Attachment 5 - Table 5 Submissions
Page 33 and 34: Attachment 5 - Table 5 Submissions
Page 43 and 44: Linear separation rules are not fai
Page 81 and 82:
Council Attachments Page 80 ITEM 12
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247:
Attachment 7 - Council report 24 Ju
show all

Attachment 1-7 - City of Ryde

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?